The first major feature documentary film revealing the impact of overfishing…
One Ocean: The Changing Sea
- Description
- Reviews
- Citation
- Cataloging
- Transcript
Strange days are dawning in the global sea. Creatures are on the move. Dead zones are expanding. The foundation of life is slowly eroding. It's hard to imagine that humans could ever alter something as vast as the ocean, but that's exactly what we're doing. Over the past 200 years, we've poured more than two trillion metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
As THE CHANGING SEA vividly illustrates, that carbon dioxide isn't just changing the climate on land. It's transforming the ocean in ways that haven't been seen for millions of years. Scientists around the world are in a race to understand these changes and what they'll mean for thousands of species - including ours.
'Very impressive! One Ocean is an exceptional series of videos focused on some of the most pressing problems threatening the health and future of the oceans. Accompanying highly respected scientists on research cruises and underwater dives, Footprints in the Sand and The Changing Sea present a powerful set of interviews and images that clearly explain the science behind the complex issues of hypoxia, ocean acidification, and overfishing. The geographic diversity of the areas covered, the superb quality and high definition videos, and the lucid explanations of the science provide a powerful and credible set of stories...These are moving and compelling stories of ocean researchers investigating the problems humans have created in the sea and explaining why our one ocean needs our help now.' Dr. Gary Griggs, Distinguished Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Director of the Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Author, Living with the Changing California Coast and Introduction to California Beaches and Coast
'There are a lot of DVDs available on topics relating to the ocean, but these are some of the best I have seen. I enjoyed the way in which information was conveyed and was pleased to learn things I had not seen in previous videos... I highly recommend this series to public, high-school, and college libraries.' Barbara Butler, University of Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Educational Media Reviews Online
'Puts viewers in the passenger seat along-side scientists, fishermen and explorers on numerous ocean-going expeditions...Most impressive is the ample footage from deep-sea explorations--courtesy of research submersibles. These give us a window into alien worlds...Appropriate for audiences from grade school students to adults.' Timothy Oleson, EARTH Magazine
'The Changing Sea is a compelling introduction to a series of modern ocean mysteries and troubling trends that scientists are investigating. Each is explained with a combination of stunning video close-ups and landscape views and interviews with fishermen and scientists who are on the front lines and on the case. The stories provide reason for grave concern but ultimately invite and encourage each of us to participate in envisioning new ways to relate to the ocean world.' John C. Anderson, Director of Education, New England Aquarium
'Very well done. The subjects chosen in The Changing Sea, the systems used to illustrate them, and the scientists interviewed were just right. The footage and dialogue were terrific.' Dr. Joseph Torres, Professor, Biological Oceanography, University of South Florida
'The Changing Sea makes convincing connections that illuminate additive and maybe synergistic negative human impacts on marine systems that are often so subtle as to be overlooked. Minor changes in ocean temperatures, pH, salinity and species composition may go unnoticed by casual observers. Taken together, these seemingly minor changes are likely to lead to unintended negative consequences of major magnitude. I will use it in the classroom to inform a discussion of how feedback loops at any level in a food web can lead to unintended consequences.' Dr. Donald Baltz, Professor and Chair, Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University
'I have finally found a film series that thoroughly covers all of the current marine topics that I teach in the classroom which includes MPAs, marine ecosystems, sustainability, international coastal culture, climate change and the formation of ocean life. It is presented in a sense of urgency and at the same time provides essential background information peaking the viewer's interest with animations and interviews with seasoned marine scientists and beautiful cinematography! One Ocean should be an integral part of any environmental studies course.' Michelle Ashley, Environmental Science teacher, South Aiken High School
'The Changing Sea presents fascinating case studies of the looming threats of the evil twins of ocean warming and acidification...Ocean warming is already disrupting ocean ecosystems. Also caused by carbon emissions, ocean acidification [is] a global problem that will worsen unless society finally addresses the dangers of unlimited burning of fossil fuels and forests.' Dr. Mark Hixon, Professor of Marine Conservation and Biology, Department of Zoology, Oregon State University
'[The Changing Sea is] a classroom friendly program that will enhance general science and environmental science classes studying oceanography.' Patricia Ann Owens, School Library Journal
'All the videos in this series are visually stimulating, and [The Changing Sea] is no exception...These videos should become an integral part of any library or multi-media part of a teacher's arsenal. Both informative and awakening, they were expertly produced, and it shows on all levels.' Marc Zucker, Assistant Professor, NSTA Recommends
Citation
Main credits
								Suzuki, David T. (narrator)
Buffie, Erna (film director)
Jensen-Carr, Merit (film producer)
Moore, Sandra (film producer)
							
Other credits
Editor, David McGunigal; cinematography, Barry Lank, Keith Eidse, Ian Kerr; music, Shawn Pierce.
Distributor subjects
Biology; Climate Change/Global Warming; Earth Science; Ecology; Environment; Fisheries; Geography; Geology; Global Issues; Habitat; Marine Biology; Oceans and Coasts; Pacific Studies; Pollution; SustainabilityKeywords
WEBVTT
 
 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.360
 
 
 00:00:06.360 --> 00:00:09.580
 It\'s close to midnight, and
 scientists are just
 
 00:00:09.580 --> 00:00:12.020
 beginning their day.
 
 00:00:12.020 --> 00:00:14.370
 Moored in the middle of
 the North Pacific,
 
 00:00:14.370 --> 00:00:17.905
 they\'re jigging for squid.
 
 00:00:17.905 --> 00:00:21.080
 But the squid they want to
 catch is no ordinary
 
 00:00:21.080 --> 00:00:22.330
 cephalopod.
 
 00:00:22.330 --> 00:00:24.940
 
 
 00:00:24.940 --> 00:00:29.350
 It\'s a voracious predator native
 to Mexican waters.
 
 00:00:29.350 --> 00:00:32.299
 And now, it\'s raiding
 the Canadian coast.
 
 00:00:32.299 --> 00:00:34.860
 
 
 00:00:34.860 --> 00:00:39.490
 Strange days are dawning
 in the global sea.
 
 00:00:39.490 --> 00:00:43.570
 Creatures are on the move.
 
 00:00:43.570 --> 00:00:45.480
 Dead zones are expanding.
 
 00:00:45.480 --> 00:00:51.430
 And the foundation of life
 is slowly eroding.
 
 00:00:51.430 --> 00:00:55.260
 Scientists around the world are
 in a race to understand
 
 00:00:55.260 --> 00:01:00.360
 those changes and what they\'ll
 mean for thousands of species,
 
 00:01:00.360 --> 00:01:01.610
 including ours.
 
 00:01:01.610 --> 00:01:24.590
 
 
 00:01:24.590 --> 00:01:27.490
 This is sea water, and the Earth
 is covered in more than
 
 00:01:27.490 --> 00:01:29.850
 a billion, billion tons of it.
 
 00:01:29.850 --> 00:01:32.330
 It\'s hard to imagine that
 humans could ever
 
 00:01:32.330 --> 00:01:35.760
 fundamentally alter something
 as vast as the ocean.
 
 00:01:35.760 --> 00:01:38.180
 But that\'s exactly
 what we\'re doing.
 
 00:01:38.180 --> 00:01:41.140
 We\'re interfering with basic
 systems that have kept the
 
 00:01:41.140 --> 00:01:43.520
 ocean in sync for millions
 of years.
 
 00:01:43.520 --> 00:01:46.800
 It means we\'re messing with the
 life support system of the
 
 00:01:46.800 --> 00:01:49.000
 planet, ours included.
 
 00:01:49.000 --> 00:01:52.410
 We now have a choice in shaping
 the future ocean.
 
 00:01:52.410 --> 00:01:55.270
 The question is, which future
 will we choose?
 
 00:01:55.270 --> 00:02:02.900
 
 
 00:02:02.900 --> 00:02:06.350
 On the west coast of Vancouver
 Island, a fishing boat heads
 
 00:02:06.350 --> 00:02:08.449
 into port to offload
 its catch.
 
 00:02:08.449 --> 00:02:12.180
 
 
 00:02:12.180 --> 00:02:14.490
 It\'s been an unusual
 season for hake
 
 00:02:14.490 --> 00:02:16.700
 fisherman, Corey Gale.
 
 00:02:16.700 --> 00:02:21.690
 The predator from Mexico has
 invaded his fishing grounds.
 
 00:02:21.690 --> 00:02:22.660
 I was quite surprised.
 
 00:02:22.660 --> 00:02:24.150
 We just caught a
 Humboldt squid.
 
 00:02:24.150 --> 00:02:25.660
 And we\'re only eight miles
 off [INAUDIBLE]
 
 00:02:25.660 --> 00:02:27.010
 where we caught this fish.
 
 00:02:27.010 --> 00:02:29.915
 And the amount that we\'re seeing
 now in the area, it\'s
 
 00:02:29.915 --> 00:02:31.165
 just unprecedented, really.
 
 00:02:31.165 --> 00:02:34.620
 
 
 00:02:34.620 --> 00:02:36.720
 It is impacting our fishery,
 because they are
 
 00:02:36.720 --> 00:02:37.600
 showing up in our nets.
 
 00:02:37.600 --> 00:02:40.830
 And the hake that come up with
 them, half of them, they\'re
 
 00:02:40.830 --> 00:02:41.250
 chewed right up.
 
 00:02:41.250 --> 00:02:42.840
 They\'re half eaten.
 
 00:02:42.840 --> 00:02:45.150
 This is a smaller Humboldt.
 
 00:02:45.150 --> 00:02:47.150
 We\'ve weighed mantles
 at 25 pounds,
 
 00:02:47.150 --> 00:02:48.910
 just the mantle itself.
 
 00:02:48.910 --> 00:02:51.920
 They\'ve got a pretty nasty
 little beak in here that\'s
 
 00:02:51.920 --> 00:02:56.850
 like a little parrot beak,
 so they can eat.
 
 00:02:56.850 --> 00:03:00.530
 I\'ve seen them come up and grab
 seagulls off the surface.
 
 00:03:00.530 --> 00:03:03.170
 Grabbing onto their toes and
 ripping their toes off trying
 
 00:03:03.170 --> 00:03:04.270
 to eat them.
 
 00:03:04.270 --> 00:03:05.520
 It\'s unbelievable.
 
 00:03:05.520 --> 00:03:09.530
 
 
 00:03:09.530 --> 00:03:13.150
 On board the W.E. Ricker,
 scientists are racing to
 
 00:03:13.150 --> 00:03:15.680
 assess the impact this
 squid is having
 
 00:03:15.680 --> 00:03:16.930
 on the local fishery.
 
 00:03:16.930 --> 00:03:19.730
 
 
 00:03:19.730 --> 00:03:23.220
 Right now, they\'re trolling
 for hake, part of a survey
 
 00:03:23.220 --> 00:03:26.350
 that sets next year\'s quota
 for one of the biggest
 
 00:03:26.350 --> 00:03:29.424
 fisheries on the west coast.
 
 00:03:29.424 --> 00:03:33.620
 But this year, they\'re netting
 fewer hake, and a lot more
 
 00:03:33.620 --> 00:03:34.895
 predatory squid.
 
 00:03:34.895 --> 00:03:39.510
 
 
 00:03:39.510 --> 00:03:46.580
 In 1998, I remember we caught,
 I think, one jumbo squid.
 
 00:03:46.580 --> 00:03:50.760
 In fact, I didn\'t know
 what it was.
 
 00:03:50.760 --> 00:03:55.500
 In 2007, we end up with 80.
 
 00:03:55.500 --> 00:04:02.820
 In this year, 2009, we have been
 following squid in a very
 
 00:04:02.820 --> 00:04:07.500
 identifiable layer from the
 Canadian US border, right on
 
 00:04:07.500 --> 00:04:13.055
 up to Queen Charlotte Sound,
 where we are now.
 
 00:04:13.055 --> 00:04:16.519
 And they know that because this
 year, they\'re not just
 
 00:04:16.519 --> 00:04:18.500
 counting hake.
 
 00:04:18.500 --> 00:04:23.760
 For the first time, they\'re
 also surveying the squid.
 
 00:04:23.760 --> 00:04:27.830
 Using acoustical instruments to
 identify its location, they
 
 00:04:27.830 --> 00:04:31.490
 confirm what they\'re seeing at
 night by jigging, because
 
 00:04:31.490 --> 00:04:34.450
 that\'s when the squid feeds
 near the surface.
 
 00:04:34.450 --> 00:04:37.220
 As the night gets darker, you
 get to two in the morning,
 
 00:04:37.220 --> 00:04:39.410
 everything\'s moved up
 the water column.
 
 00:04:39.410 --> 00:04:41.910
 The hand jigs are only working
 the top 10 or 20 meters.
 
 00:04:41.910 --> 00:04:44.540
 The squid are right up
 near the surface.
 
 00:04:44.540 --> 00:04:46.610
 When they\'re brought in on the
 jigs, you can see other squid
 
 00:04:46.610 --> 00:04:47.910
 chasing them up as well.
 
 00:04:47.910 --> 00:04:51.295
 
 
 00:04:51.295 --> 00:04:53.810
 When we were doing the acoustic
 work we saw a large
 
 00:04:53.810 --> 00:04:57.150
 layer, and that layer
 went on for miles.
 
 00:04:57.150 --> 00:04:59.920
 If you have a school or a
 population that\'s spread over
 
 00:04:59.920 --> 00:05:02.050
 that kind of an area, you
 would be talking about
 
 00:05:02.050 --> 00:05:03.300
 millions of squid.
 
 00:05:03.300 --> 00:05:05.330
 
 
 00:05:05.330 --> 00:05:11.330
 And that\'s a lot of hungry squid
 eating a lot of fish.
 
 00:05:11.330 --> 00:05:15.460
 In a life span of just one or
 two years, the Humboldt can
 
 00:05:15.460 --> 00:05:19.980
 grow into a two meter long,
 45 kilogram predator.
 
 00:05:19.980 --> 00:05:24.785
 To get that big that fast,
 it\'s constantly feeding.
 
 00:05:24.785 --> 00:05:27.070
 And it doesn\'t eat alone.
 
 00:05:27.070 --> 00:05:30.670
 This squid hunts in packs
 and feeds on whatever is
 
 00:05:30.670 --> 00:05:35.430
 available, from krill and
 hake to its own kind.
 
 00:05:35.430 --> 00:05:38.290
 
 
 00:05:38.290 --> 00:05:41.560
 But this year, the squid
 isn\'t just eating hake.
 
 00:05:41.560 --> 00:05:44.860
 It\'s changing its behavior.
 
 00:05:44.860 --> 00:05:47.620
 There is a change in the
 distribution pattern of hake.
 
 00:05:47.620 --> 00:05:51.200
 They\'re down deeper, they\'re
 more dispersed.
 
 00:05:51.200 --> 00:05:53.690
 We haven\'t seen the abundance
 that might be
 
 00:05:53.690 --> 00:05:56.740
 expected in our waters.
 
 00:05:56.740 --> 00:05:59.350
 I\'m pretty sure I\'m seeing
 some change in schooling
 
 00:05:59.350 --> 00:06:02.910
 behavior as a result
 of the squid.
 
 00:06:02.910 --> 00:06:05.340
 And that\'s not the only
 change Ken and his
 
 00:06:05.340 --> 00:06:07.500
 colleagues have seen.
 
 00:06:07.500 --> 00:06:10.950
 A fish that traditionally spawns
 off California, the
 
 00:06:10.950 --> 00:06:14.550
 hake now seems to be breeding
 up here, because the team is
 
 00:06:14.550 --> 00:06:16.610
 catching a lot more juveniles.
 
 00:06:16.610 --> 00:06:19.520
 And that could pose a serious
 threat in the future.
 
 00:06:19.520 --> 00:06:22.640
 
 
 00:06:22.640 --> 00:06:25.140
 Sure, they\'re spawning off
 of our waters, but
 
 00:06:25.140 --> 00:06:26.800
 are the young surviving?
 
 00:06:26.800 --> 00:06:30.660
 They may not have the same sort
 of environment to survive
 
 00:06:30.660 --> 00:06:34.250
 in as a young fish as they did
 in California [? Bay ?]
 
 00:06:34.250 --> 00:06:35.490
 for instance.
 
 00:06:35.490 --> 00:06:36.740
 So, that\'s a threat.
 
 00:06:36.740 --> 00:06:39.240
 
 
 00:06:39.240 --> 00:06:42.090
 So what\'s pushing the
 hake and Humboldt
 
 00:06:42.090 --> 00:06:45.360
 further and further north?
 
 00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:50.050
 Some 2,000 kilometers south in
 Monterey Bay, California, deep
 
 00:06:50.050 --> 00:06:53.920
 sea pioneer Bruce Robison
 witnessed phase one of the
 
 00:06:53.920 --> 00:06:55.405
 Humboldt northward migration.
 
 00:06:55.405 --> 00:06:58.110
 
 
 00:06:58.110 --> 00:07:03.020
 On a day like this in 1998, he
 and his team lowered their
 
 00:07:03.020 --> 00:07:07.580
 camera mounted ROV
 into the ocean.
 
 00:07:07.580 --> 00:07:10.640
 When they get to the control
 room and switch on the camera,
 
 00:07:10.640 --> 00:07:12.472
 they see this.
 
 00:07:12.472 --> 00:07:13.820
 The Humboldt squid.
 
 00:07:13.820 --> 00:07:18.220
 If we can get more of a look at
 that, that would be great.
 
 00:07:18.220 --> 00:07:21.570
 Robison has been conducting
 underwater surveys since the
 
 00:07:21.570 --> 00:07:28.510
 mid 1980s, and he\'s never seen
 this particular squid before.
 
 00:07:28.510 --> 00:07:31.760
 And is there a statistical test
 you can run on that to
 
 00:07:31.760 --> 00:07:34.930
 show it\'s not a fluke?
 
 00:07:34.930 --> 00:07:39.090
 Over the next few years, Robison
 searches for clues to
 
 00:07:39.090 --> 00:07:40.655
 explain the sudden invasion.
 
 00:07:40.655 --> 00:07:46.810
 
 
 00:07:46.810 --> 00:07:50.850
 Lack of predation may be
 part of the problem.
 
 00:07:50.850 --> 00:07:55.710
 Big predators have been fished
 out in the squid\'s home range.
 
 00:07:55.710 --> 00:08:00.050
 Recent estimates suggest that
 90% of the big fishes, the
 
 00:08:00.050 --> 00:08:04.240
 tunas, the billfishes,
 have been fished out.
 
 00:08:04.240 --> 00:08:07.430
 Those big fishes eat
 the baby squid.
 
 00:08:07.430 --> 00:08:10.890
 In response to that, in the
 home range, the squid
 
 00:08:10.890 --> 00:08:15.170
 population grew, and grew,
 and grew, and grew.
 
 00:08:15.170 --> 00:08:19.520
 But an exploding population
 doesn\'t tell the whole story.
 
 00:08:19.520 --> 00:08:21.660
 So Robison looks back
 at the records.
 
 00:08:21.660 --> 00:08:25.820
 
 
 00:08:25.820 --> 00:08:30.715
 Fishermen have seen this squid
 before during warmer periods.
 
 00:08:30.715 --> 00:08:33.887
 And the year Robison spots
 them is one of
 
 00:08:33.887 --> 00:08:35.137
 the warmest on record.
 
 00:08:35.137 --> 00:08:38.670
 
 
 00:08:38.670 --> 00:08:43.510
 We saw no evidence of Humboldt
 squid until the
 
 00:08:43.510 --> 00:08:47.700
 1997, 1998 El Nino.
 
 00:08:47.700 --> 00:08:51.990
 And when that slug of warm water
 moved into Monterey Bay,
 
 00:08:51.990 --> 00:08:54.910
 Humboldt squid came with it.
 
 00:08:54.910 --> 00:08:57.250
 The numbers of hake had dropped
 off significantly
 
 00:08:57.250 --> 00:08:59.600
 while they were here.
 
 00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:03.640
 And then in 2002, there
 was a little El Nino.
 
 00:09:03.640 --> 00:09:09.050
 But the squid came back, and
 they\'ve been here ever since.
 
 00:09:09.050 --> 00:09:14.150
 I think that episodic range
 expansions during El Nino
 
 00:09:14.150 --> 00:09:17.460
 periods were a natural
 process.
 
 00:09:17.460 --> 00:09:21.560
 But the fact that that door has
 been forced open and now
 
 00:09:21.560 --> 00:09:24.870
 stays open, is our
 responsibility.
 
 00:09:24.870 --> 00:09:27.910
 
 
 00:09:27.910 --> 00:09:31.580
 And it\'s our responsibility
 because of this.
 
 00:09:31.580 --> 00:09:35.000
 Thanks to a blanket of carbon
 dioxide produced by the
 
 00:09:35.000 --> 00:09:38.690
 burning of fossil fuels, the
 planet\'s warmest climate
 
 00:09:38.690 --> 00:09:43.300
 cycle, El Nino, may be getting
 more persistent.
 
 00:09:43.300 --> 00:09:46.770
 That cycle originates in the
 tropics, but it seems to be
 
 00:09:46.770 --> 00:09:50.710
 driving up ocean temperatures
 in many other regions of the
 
 00:09:50.710 --> 00:09:52.740
 global sea.
 
 00:09:52.740 --> 00:09:56.480
 Climate change certainly
 contributes to the fact that
 
 00:09:56.480 --> 00:09:58.500
 the Humboldt squid
 are moving north.
 
 00:09:58.500 --> 00:10:00.810
 In the northern hemisphere
 in south, in the southern
 
 00:10:00.810 --> 00:10:01.610
 hemisphere.
 
 00:10:01.610 --> 00:10:07.130
 We\'re making the waters that
 they are now inhabiting much
 
 00:10:07.130 --> 00:10:10.510
 more welcoming to the squid.
 
 00:10:10.510 --> 00:10:14.670
 And it\'s highly likely that
 a lot of other species are
 
 00:10:14.670 --> 00:10:16.690
 undergoing the same
 kind of process.
 
 00:10:16.690 --> 00:10:19.355
 
 
 00:10:19.355 --> 00:10:23.920
 And that process may
 be well under way.
 
 00:10:23.920 --> 00:10:27.600
 According to recent estimates,
 the world\'s fish stocks are
 
 00:10:27.600 --> 00:10:30.930
 swimming poleward at
 a rate of 40 to 60
 
 00:10:30.930 --> 00:10:32.765
 kilometers per decade.
 
 00:10:32.765 --> 00:10:35.790
 
 
 00:10:35.790 --> 00:10:38.580
 Some places might be so
 perturbed by these new species
 
 00:10:38.580 --> 00:10:40.630
 coming in that they can\'t
 function the way they used to
 
 00:10:40.630 --> 00:10:41.990
 be, and functionally collapse.
 
 00:10:41.990 --> 00:10:44.850
 Others may be just fine.
 
 00:10:44.850 --> 00:10:46.910
 That\'s something that people
 are all over the world
 
 00:10:46.910 --> 00:10:48.590
 scrambling to find out.
 
 00:10:48.590 --> 00:10:52.050
 Because we have this window of
 time to try to estimate which
 
 00:10:52.050 --> 00:10:56.720
 ecosystems are more at risk,
 and then how the climate is
 
 00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:57.970
 going to affect that.
 
 00:10:57.970 --> 00:11:02.390
 
 
 00:11:02.390 --> 00:11:06.810
 But invading species aren\'t
 the only threat.
 
 00:11:06.810 --> 00:11:10.590
 Scientists like Steve Palumbi
 are equally concerned about
 
 00:11:10.590 --> 00:11:14.190
 plants and animals
 that can\'t move.
 
 00:11:14.190 --> 00:11:17.480
 Many are sensitive to
 temperature, and some form the
 
 00:11:17.480 --> 00:11:19.910
 foundation of entire
 ecosystems.
 
 00:11:19.910 --> 00:11:26.230
 
 
 00:11:26.230 --> 00:11:29.930
 Here in Monterey Bay, kelp
 forests are the primary
 
 00:11:29.930 --> 00:11:33.780
 coastal ecosystem, life support
 for thousands of
 
 00:11:33.780 --> 00:11:37.355
 creatures that live above
 the water and below it.
 
 00:11:37.355 --> 00:11:40.090
 
 
 00:11:40.090 --> 00:11:44.200
 A favorite dive location for the
 resident sea otter and for
 
 00:11:44.200 --> 00:11:47.854
 biologist, Steve Palumbi.
 
 00:11:47.854 --> 00:11:48.846
 Clear?
 
 00:11:48.846 --> 00:11:50.096
 Clear.
 
 00:11:50.096 --> 00:11:58.000
 
 
 00:11:58.000 --> 00:12:02.900
 Peaceful, majestic, and teeming
 with life, kelp
 
 00:12:02.900 --> 00:12:05.210
 forests are found
 in cool, coastal
 
 00:12:05.210 --> 00:12:07.540
 waters around the world.
 
 00:12:07.540 --> 00:12:10.530
 And they\'re among the most
 productive and dynamic
 
 00:12:10.530 --> 00:12:12.170
 ecosystems on the planet.
 
 00:12:12.170 --> 00:12:14.890
 
 
 00:12:14.890 --> 00:12:20.170
 The productivity of it churns
 out a whole set of species, of
 
 00:12:20.170 --> 00:12:21.390
 fish invertebrates.
 
 00:12:21.390 --> 00:12:24.900
 Not only feed on the water and
 the plankton in it, but they
 
 00:12:24.900 --> 00:12:29.280
 also feed on the kelp, and they
 feed on the nutrients
 
 00:12:29.280 --> 00:12:31.900
 that the kelp dumps back
 into the water itself.
 
 00:12:31.900 --> 00:12:38.136
 
 
 00:12:38.136 --> 00:12:41.040
 But giant kelp does
 best in water
 
 00:12:41.040 --> 00:12:44.280
 temperatures of 10 to 18 degrees.
 
 00:12:44.280 --> 00:12:47.280
 So if temperature continues
 to climb, this
 
 00:12:47.280 --> 00:12:49.160
 ecosystem will be at risk.
 
 00:12:49.160 --> 00:12:52.340
 
 
 00:12:52.340 --> 00:12:57.640
 Every ecosystem, kelp forests,
 sea grass beds, oyster reefs,
 
 00:12:57.640 --> 00:13:00.770
 coral reefs, they all are
 feeling the brunt
 
 00:13:00.770 --> 00:13:02.540
 of this same problem.
 
 00:13:02.540 --> 00:13:06.230
 
 
 00:13:06.230 --> 00:13:08.960
 But heat isn\'t the only problem
 they\'re facing.
 
 00:13:08.960 --> 00:13:12.950
 
 
 00:13:12.950 --> 00:13:19.060
 In 2006, in the deep ocean off
 Oregon, thousands of creatures
 
 00:13:19.060 --> 00:13:23.300
 suddenly disappeared, and
 scientists raced out to sea to
 
 00:13:23.300 --> 00:13:24.550
 find out why.
 
 00:13:24.550 --> 00:13:32.730
 
 
 00:13:32.730 --> 00:13:37.466
 The Pacific Ocean just off
 Cape Perpetua, Oregon.
 
 00:13:37.466 --> 00:13:41.970
 A bountiful ecosystem that\'s
 produced enough fish and crabs
 
 00:13:41.970 --> 00:13:43.873
 to support generations
 of fisherman.
 
 00:13:43.873 --> 00:13:47.490
 
 
 00:13:47.490 --> 00:13:53.000
 But in 2002, a strange mystery
 begins to unfold here.
 
 00:13:53.000 --> 00:13:55.890
 Fisherman send out
 alarming reports.
 
 00:13:55.890 --> 00:14:00.970
 Dead or dying dungeness crabs
 coming up in their traps.
 
 00:14:00.970 --> 00:14:05.170
 Others, like Al [? Pizarre ?],
 witness even stranger events.
 
 00:14:05.170 --> 00:14:08.020
 
 
 00:14:08.020 --> 00:14:13.410
 The crabs ran offshore, inshore
 to the surf line or to
 
 00:14:13.410 --> 00:14:15.500
 the north out of the zone.
 
 00:14:15.500 --> 00:14:18.310
 As did the fish off the reefs,
 some reefs down off Cape
 
 00:14:18.310 --> 00:14:21.200
 Perpetua, were found to
 be vacant of fish.
 
 00:14:21.200 --> 00:14:24.800
 
 
 00:14:24.800 --> 00:14:27.880
 And we immediately thought, as
 did much of the public, that
 
 00:14:27.880 --> 00:14:29.180
 it was a toxin.
 
 00:14:29.180 --> 00:14:31.750
 Something in the water
 was killing things.
 
 00:14:31.750 --> 00:14:33.490
 And we hurriedly looked
 at the records.
 
 00:14:33.490 --> 00:14:35.430
 I had some from offshore.
 
 00:14:35.430 --> 00:14:38.510
 My colleagues had them from
 right near shore.
 
 00:14:38.510 --> 00:14:40.140
 And we quickly compared
 them and found
 
 00:14:40.140 --> 00:14:41.390
 that it was low oxygen.
 
 00:14:41.390 --> 00:14:45.660
 
 
 00:14:45.660 --> 00:14:48.260
 We saw the unique occurrence.
 
 00:14:48.260 --> 00:14:51.275
 In the summertime, there\'s
 usually an octopus spawn.
 
 00:14:51.275 --> 00:14:55.330
 And the little baby octopus,
 inch and a half long, they
 
 00:14:55.330 --> 00:14:57.740
 were actually climbing
 up our crab ropes.
 
 00:14:57.740 --> 00:15:01.510
 And we saw dozens of little
 octopus in their attempt to
 
 00:15:01.510 --> 00:15:04.900
 escape the low oxygen
 at the bottom, and
 
 00:15:04.900 --> 00:15:06.150
 getting up to the surface.
 
 00:15:06.150 --> 00:15:08.750
 
 
 00:15:08.750 --> 00:15:12.780
 The strange events off Cape
 Perpetua send ocean scientists
 
 00:15:12.780 --> 00:15:17.780
 Francis Chan and Jack Barth out
 to sea to investigate why
 
 00:15:17.780 --> 00:15:22.040
 oxygen levels are dropping,
 training their sensors on what
 
 00:15:22.040 --> 00:15:25.280
 will come to be known as
 the Oregon Dead Zone.
 
 00:15:25.280 --> 00:15:30.080
 
 
 00:15:30.080 --> 00:15:33.090
 Well, it was scary because the
 question is, well, how big is
 
 00:15:33.090 --> 00:15:36.910
 this, and how long is
 this going to last?
 
 00:15:36.910 --> 00:15:39.390
 We thought that that was just
 a once in a lifetime event.
 
 00:15:39.390 --> 00:15:42.960
 But every year since then, we\'ve
 been able to track this
 
 00:15:42.960 --> 00:15:46.870
 reappearance of low oxygen
 water on a shelf.
 
 00:15:46.870 --> 00:15:51.750
 So what\'s causing the return
 of the low oxygen zone?
 
 00:15:51.750 --> 00:15:55.360
 Barth and Chan immediately rule
 out pollutants, because
 
 00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:59.410
 there are no major rivers
 emptying into this coast.
 
 00:15:59.410 --> 00:16:02.390
 Which leaves just
 one possibility.
 
 00:16:02.390 --> 00:16:05.120
 A change in the ocean itself.
 
 00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:08.170
 It\'s a alteration that
 we\'re seeing.
 
 00:16:08.170 --> 00:16:10.615
 We kind of think of it
 as an arrhythmia.
 
 00:16:10.615 --> 00:16:14.750
 So a change in the
 natural rhythms.
 
 00:16:14.750 --> 00:16:17.520
 And the natural rhythms
 here are set by a
 
 00:16:17.520 --> 00:16:20.960
 process called upwelling.
 
 00:16:20.960 --> 00:16:24.550
 During the summer, powerful
 winds from the north drive the
 
 00:16:24.550 --> 00:16:27.615
 nutrient-rich waters of the
 deep up to the surface.
 
 00:16:27.615 --> 00:16:31.250
 
 
 00:16:31.250 --> 00:16:35.630
 Those nutrients feed life forms
 like this, millions of
 
 00:16:35.630 --> 00:16:38.130
 microscopic plants called
 phytoplankton.
 
 00:16:38.130 --> 00:16:49.340
 
 
 00:16:49.340 --> 00:16:53.340
 Food for countless creatures,
 this astonishing floating
 
 00:16:53.340 --> 00:16:56.070
 forest fuels one of
 the most valuable
 
 00:16:56.070 --> 00:16:59.090
 ecosystems on the planet.
 
 00:16:59.090 --> 00:17:01.170
 Though we\'re actually really
 lucky to be working in such a
 
 00:17:01.170 --> 00:17:04.410
 productive ecosystem, because
 there aren\'t that many places
 
 00:17:04.410 --> 00:17:06.819
 is the world\'s ocean
 that\'s like this.
 
 00:17:06.819 --> 00:17:09.250
 And these upwelling ecosystems,
 they\'re really
 
 00:17:09.250 --> 00:17:12.900
 small in area, maybe 1% of the
 world\'s ocean, but they\'re
 
 00:17:12.900 --> 00:17:17.770
 responsible for nearly 25%
 of the wild fish catches.
 
 00:17:17.770 --> 00:17:21.200
 So we\'re seeing this amazing
 community of rockfish.
 
 00:17:21.200 --> 00:17:23.720
 There\'s a lot of different
 species down here.
 
 00:17:23.720 --> 00:17:27.740
 Supporting some of these fishes
 are this amazingly rich
 
 00:17:27.740 --> 00:17:30.140
 community of marine
 vertebrate.
 
 00:17:30.140 --> 00:17:34.870
 And this is what a healthy and
 productive ecosystem can look
 
 00:17:34.870 --> 00:17:37.790
 like off the Oregon coast.
 
 00:17:37.790 --> 00:17:40.510
 And it\'s phytoplankton
 that help support
 
 00:17:40.510 --> 00:17:42.810
 this amazing ecosystem.
 
 00:17:42.810 --> 00:17:48.370
 But too much plankton can be
 too much of a good thing.
 
 00:17:48.370 --> 00:17:53.330
 In 2006, unusually large
 phytoplankton blooms begin to
 
 00:17:53.330 --> 00:17:56.410
 form off the Oregon coast.
 
 00:17:56.410 --> 00:18:00.670
 The blooms go on for weeks,
 and a deadly process spins
 
 00:18:00.670 --> 00:18:01.920
 into motion.
 
 00:18:01.920 --> 00:18:07.600
 
 
 00:18:07.600 --> 00:18:12.450
 Dead phytoplankton rains into
 the depths as marine snow,
 
 00:18:12.450 --> 00:18:16.460
 where it\'s consumed by bacteria
 that burns up oxygen
 
 00:18:16.460 --> 00:18:19.100
 at a furious rate.
 
 00:18:19.100 --> 00:18:24.520
 For the first time, levels
 bottom out to zero, and 3,000
 
 00:18:24.520 --> 00:18:28.490
 square kilometers of ocean
 become an oxygen-starved
 
 00:18:28.490 --> 00:18:29.740
 killing zone.
 
 00:18:29.740 --> 00:18:35.635
 
 
 00:18:35.635 --> 00:18:39.120
 We saw no fish during this
 period, because all of the
 
 00:18:39.120 --> 00:18:42.460
 fish either died, or they just
 fled and tried to move, find
 
 00:18:42.460 --> 00:18:45.050
 waters that are richer
 in oxygen.
 
 00:18:45.050 --> 00:18:48.790
 This was a beautiful Pycnopodia
 star, literally
 
 00:18:48.790 --> 00:18:51.070
 degrading and disintegrating
 and rotting in
 
 00:18:51.070 --> 00:18:52.320
 front of our eyes.
 
 00:18:52.320 --> 00:18:58.200
 
 
 00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:02.480
 Only a major disruption in the
 upwelling cycle could cause
 
 00:19:02.480 --> 00:19:05.090
 such a devastating
 loss of life.
 
 00:19:05.090 --> 00:19:10.700
 And by 2006, Barth and Chan
 suspect that climate change is
 
 00:19:10.700 --> 00:19:11.810
 the main culprit.
 
 00:19:11.810 --> 00:19:14.310
 Way off the corner there,
 [? Mate ?].
 
 00:19:14.310 --> 00:19:16.810
 Grab the other boat hook.
 
 00:19:16.810 --> 00:19:20.940
 Global warming seems to be
 driving stronger winds, and
 
 00:19:20.940 --> 00:19:23.070
 stronger winds are
 super charging
 
 00:19:23.070 --> 00:19:25.450
 the upwelling process.
 
 00:19:25.450 --> 00:19:28.810
 But there\'s another massive
 change happening some 500
 
 00:19:28.810 --> 00:19:33.740
 kilometers north that may also
 be driving down oxygen levels
 
 00:19:33.740 --> 00:19:37.730
 in the Oregon Dead Zone.
 
 00:19:37.730 --> 00:19:41.930
 Just off Canada, in the
 subarctic Pacific, the deep
 
 00:19:41.930 --> 00:19:46.570
 ocean is undergoing a disturbing
 transformation, one
 
 00:19:46.570 --> 00:19:49.725
 that Frank Whitney has been
 monitoring for over a decade.
 
 00:19:49.725 --> 00:19:53.290
 
 
 00:19:53.290 --> 00:19:56.720
 For more than 50 years, chemical
 oceanographers like
 
 00:19:56.720 --> 00:20:01.360
 Whitney have journeyed across
 the same 1,400 kilometers of
 
 00:20:01.360 --> 00:20:05.440
 subarctic sea, sampling seawater
 and measuring its
 
 00:20:05.440 --> 00:20:08.200
 properties.
 
 00:20:08.200 --> 00:20:13.000
 And after surveying more than
 five decades of oxygen data,
 
 00:20:13.000 --> 00:20:15.720
 Whitney makes a shocking
 discovery.
 
 00:20:15.720 --> 00:20:20.040
 The deep ocean here is
 also losing oxygen.
 
 00:20:20.040 --> 00:20:22.195
 There was a distinct
 trend over time.
 
 00:20:22.195 --> 00:20:28.850
 A 22?cline in oxygen from
 about 150 to 600 meters.
 
 00:20:28.850 --> 00:20:31.580
 It\'s a huge drop.
 
 00:20:31.580 --> 00:20:35.170
 My evidence from deep ocean
 suggested that a good part of
 
 00:20:35.170 --> 00:20:36.760
 the story was due
 to the reduced
 
 00:20:36.760 --> 00:20:38.720
 ventilation of the ocean.
 
 00:20:38.720 --> 00:20:42.640
 And ventilation is the main
 way the ocean breathes.
 
 00:20:42.640 --> 00:20:46.110
 
 
 00:20:46.110 --> 00:20:51.650
 Most oxygen is absorbed at the
 surface of the subpolar seas.
 
 00:20:51.650 --> 00:20:54.950
 Winter storms cool the surface
 water, making it
 
 00:20:54.950 --> 00:20:58.300
 heavy enough to sink.
 
 00:20:58.300 --> 00:21:02.220
 Like a deep breath, that sinking
 water transports
 
 00:21:02.220 --> 00:21:03.665
 oxygen into the depths.
 
 00:21:03.665 --> 00:21:06.270
 
 
 00:21:06.270 --> 00:21:11.075
 But as the planet heats up and
 glaciers melt, ocean breathing
 
 00:21:11.075 --> 00:21:13.900
 is slowing down.
 
 00:21:13.900 --> 00:21:17.940
 Flooded with fresh water, the
 surface layer is too light to
 
 00:21:17.940 --> 00:21:20.720
 sink, and that\'s cutting
 off the oxygen
 
 00:21:20.720 --> 00:21:22.495
 supply in the deep ocean.
 
 00:21:22.495 --> 00:21:27.190
 
 
 00:21:27.190 --> 00:21:31.180
 A gentle slope towards oxygen
 loss, even down at 800 meters.
 
 00:21:31.180 --> 00:21:34.450
 It is very evident in the
 subarctic Pacific, but it\'s
 
 00:21:34.450 --> 00:21:37.820
 also being picked up in the
 North Atlantic where there is
 
 00:21:37.820 --> 00:21:40.420
 also a freshening of
 the surface ocean.
 
 00:21:40.420 --> 00:21:46.260
 So if this problem really gets
 rooted in the North Atlantic,
 
 00:21:46.260 --> 00:21:47.810
 then you\'re looking at something
 that is going to
 
 00:21:47.810 --> 00:21:50.870
 carry through most of
 the world\'s oceans.
 
 00:21:50.870 --> 00:21:55.520
 And if you look at the trouble
 caused by just a 22?cline
 
 00:21:55.520 --> 00:21:59.620
 in oxygen, you get a sense
 of the global threat.
 
 00:21:59.620 --> 00:22:02.910
 Especially to deep dwelling
 ground fish like halibut,
 
 00:22:02.910 --> 00:22:07.550
 whose numbers here
 are shrinking.
 
 00:22:07.550 --> 00:22:11.120
 It\'s scary, because a lot of
 fish that are unable to
 
 00:22:11.120 --> 00:22:14.420
 tolerate low oxygen either get
 crowded into a narrower
 
 00:22:14.420 --> 00:22:17.110
 habitat, or they\'re going to
 be forced into northward
 
 00:22:17.110 --> 00:22:21.410
 migrations up into areas where
 there is more oxygen.
 
 00:22:21.410 --> 00:22:26.480
 
 
 00:22:26.480 --> 00:22:29.380
 But that\'s not Whitney\'s
 only concern.
 
 00:22:29.380 --> 00:22:34.180
 As low oxygen or hypoxic zones
 expand, it\'s not just fish
 
 00:22:34.180 --> 00:22:37.250
 that will suffer.
 
 00:22:37.250 --> 00:22:41.210
 When we think of hypoxic waters
 becoming shallower
 
 00:22:41.210 --> 00:22:44.460
 along the BC coast, we have to
 think about impacts to all the
 
 00:22:44.460 --> 00:22:47.660
 organisms that can\'t move
 out of their habitat.
 
 00:22:47.660 --> 00:22:50.990
 And a lot of those organisms
 are probably very important
 
 00:22:50.990 --> 00:22:56.020
 for just keeping the
 ecosystem healthy.
 
 00:22:56.020 --> 00:22:58.710
 Sponges and corals on the
 coast, some of them very
 
 00:22:58.710 --> 00:23:00.790
 unique to the BC coast.
 
 00:23:00.790 --> 00:23:03.640
 Hypoxia is going
 to stress them.
 
 00:23:03.640 --> 00:23:04.890
 There\'s no question.
 
 00:23:04.890 --> 00:23:09.530
 
 
 00:23:09.530 --> 00:23:13.240
 But it\'s not just subarctic
 species that are at risk,
 
 00:23:13.240 --> 00:23:17.000
 because the low oxygen waters
 here are carried all the way
 
 00:23:17.000 --> 00:23:21.250
 down this coast on the
 California current, deep water
 
 00:23:21.250 --> 00:23:24.850
 that\'s fueling the Oregon Dead
 Zone, and threatening the
 
 00:23:24.850 --> 00:23:26.890
 entire North American coast.
 
 00:23:26.890 --> 00:23:30.170
 
 
 00:23:30.170 --> 00:23:33.020
 We have very precise
 measurements over many, many
 
 00:23:33.020 --> 00:23:37.890
 years, and we can detect a trend
 that is going to lower
 
 00:23:37.890 --> 00:23:38.720
 and lower oxygen.
 
 00:23:38.720 --> 00:23:43.400
 And it\'s the same trend from
 Vancouver, British Columbia,
 
 00:23:43.400 --> 00:23:46.940
 down through Oregon, down
 through Monterey Bay, down
 
 00:23:46.940 --> 00:23:48.570
 into Southern California,
 and even
 
 00:23:48.570 --> 00:23:52.060
 connecting down to the equator.
 
 00:23:52.060 --> 00:23:56.080
 So I think you can call it a
 global phenomena that we\'ve
 
 00:23:56.080 --> 00:23:58.830
 got to keep our eyes on.
 
 00:23:58.830 --> 00:24:02.860
 And it truly is a
 global problem.
 
 00:24:02.860 --> 00:24:07.410
 On the South African and South
 American coasts, dead zones,
 
 00:24:07.410 --> 00:24:10.360
 like the one in Oregon,
 are getting worse.
 
 00:24:10.360 --> 00:24:13.570
 And low oxygen zones
 are expanding in
 
 00:24:13.570 --> 00:24:14.820
 the tropical seas.
 
 00:24:14.820 --> 00:24:17.210
 
 
 00:24:17.210 --> 00:24:21.810
 And if oxygen levels continue to
 drop, millions of creatures
 
 00:24:21.810 --> 00:24:23.900
 will feel the impact.
 
 00:24:23.900 --> 00:24:26.260
 Some may adapt.
 
 00:24:26.260 --> 00:24:27.626
 Others won\'t.
 
 00:24:27.626 --> 00:24:31.610
 
 
 00:24:31.610 --> 00:24:36.480
 But there\'s another disturbing
 change occurring in the ocean.
 
 00:24:36.480 --> 00:24:40.260
 Its basic chemistry is changing,
 and that could spell
 
 00:24:40.260 --> 00:24:42.730
 disaster for life in
 the global sea.
 
 00:24:42.730 --> 00:24:51.650
 
 
 00:24:51.650 --> 00:24:56.290
 Almost two trillion metric
 tons of carbon dioxide.
 
 00:24:56.290 --> 00:24:57.730
 That\'s what we\'ve released
 into the
 
 00:24:57.730 --> 00:25:00.680
 atmosphere in just 200 years.
 
 00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:06.480
 And more than a quarter has been
 absorbed by the ocean.
 
 00:25:06.480 --> 00:25:10.340
 As a result, seawater is
 becoming more acidic.
 
 00:25:10.340 --> 00:25:17.650
 
 
 00:25:17.650 --> 00:25:21.580
 Scientist Richard Feely and
 Debbie Ianson have been
 
 00:25:21.580 --> 00:25:25.860
 tracking ocean acidification
 on the North Pacific coast.
 
 00:25:25.860 --> 00:25:30.110
 They and other scientists
 predict a massive upsurge by
 
 00:25:30.110 --> 00:25:33.890
 the end of this century, as
 much as a 200% percent
 
 00:25:33.890 --> 00:25:37.480
 increase in ocean acidity.
 
 00:25:37.480 --> 00:25:40.680
 This is more than we have
 seen over the last 20
 
 00:25:40.680 --> 00:25:43.430
 to 25 million years.
 
 00:25:43.430 --> 00:25:47.290
 About 22 million tons of carbon
 dioxide, everyday, goes
 
 00:25:47.290 --> 00:25:49.690
 into the oceans.
 
 00:25:49.690 --> 00:25:53.010
 The impact of that uptake of
 carbon dioxide in our ocean
 
 00:25:53.010 --> 00:25:56.210
 ecosystem is really quite
 dramatic, and we\'re very
 
 00:25:56.210 --> 00:25:57.460
 concerned about that.
 
 00:25:57.460 --> 00:25:59.670
 
 
 00:25:59.670 --> 00:26:03.120
 The ocean is the largest
 reservoir of active carbon on
 
 00:26:03.120 --> 00:26:04.530
 the planet.
 
 00:26:04.530 --> 00:26:07.080
 It ultimately controls what
 the atmospheric CO2
 
 00:26:07.080 --> 00:26:09.740
 concentration is.
 
 00:26:09.740 --> 00:26:13.300
 The carbon that\'s coming from
 our cars, and factories, et
 
 00:26:13.300 --> 00:26:16.050
 cetera, that carbon enters
 at the surface.
 
 00:26:16.050 --> 00:26:20.830
 And the organisms that we depend
 upon, much of the light
 
 00:26:20.830 --> 00:26:22.830
 is in the surface, because
 that\'s where the light is.
 
 00:26:22.830 --> 00:26:26.460
 
 
 00:26:26.460 --> 00:26:30.480
 And once that carbon dioxide
 gets into the ocean, it reacts
 
 00:26:30.480 --> 00:26:34.420
 with seawater, forming carbonic
 acid and consuming
 
 00:26:34.420 --> 00:26:36.150
 carbonate ions.
 
 00:26:36.150 --> 00:26:39.590
 Double jeopardy for calcifying
 creatures like these.
 
 00:26:39.590 --> 00:26:44.160
 
 
 00:26:44.160 --> 00:26:47.950
 In the future, they won\'t have
 enough calcium carbonate to
 
 00:26:47.950 --> 00:26:49.580
 build their shells.
 
 00:26:49.580 --> 00:26:53.550
 And too much carbonic acid may
 dissolve the shells they
 
 00:26:53.550 --> 00:26:54.800
 already have.
 
 00:26:54.800 --> 00:27:01.340
 
 
 00:27:01.340 --> 00:27:05.420
 And the same fate may be facing
 the world\'s coral
 
 00:27:05.420 --> 00:27:09.260
 reefs, one of the largest
 and most important ocean
 
 00:27:09.260 --> 00:27:10.570
 ecosystems in the world.
 
 00:27:10.570 --> 00:27:17.960
 
 
 00:27:17.960 --> 00:27:22.480
 Millions of creatures depend on
 these reefs for survival.
 
 00:27:22.480 --> 00:27:25.860
 So if they disappear,
 many other species
 
 00:27:25.860 --> 00:27:27.110
 will vanish with them.
 
 00:27:27.110 --> 00:27:29.740
 
 
 00:27:29.740 --> 00:27:34.320
 Biological oceanographer Chris
 Langdon has been studying the
 
 00:27:34.320 --> 00:27:38.810
 impact of acidification on
 corals for more than a decade.
 
 00:27:38.810 --> 00:27:42.330
 Today, he\'s heading out to dive
 on a reef just off the
 
 00:27:42.330 --> 00:27:43.580
 Florida Keys.
 
 00:27:43.580 --> 00:27:45.720
 
 
 00:27:45.720 --> 00:27:48.160
 I just look forward to getting
 out of the office and getting
 
 00:27:48.160 --> 00:27:49.495
 out here on the reef.
 
 00:27:49.495 --> 00:27:53.380
 It just makes me very sad to
 think that what I\'m seeing
 
 00:27:53.380 --> 00:27:57.110
 here today, my children and
 grandchildren may not get to
 
 00:27:57.110 --> 00:28:00.990
 experience because of the rapid
 decline of the positions
 
 00:28:00.990 --> 00:28:02.240
 of the reefs.
 
 00:28:02.240 --> 00:28:07.560
 
 
 00:28:07.560 --> 00:28:11.870
 Pollution, disease,
 global warming.
 
 00:28:11.870 --> 00:28:15.800
 From Florida to Australia,
 almost 20% of the world\'s
 
 00:28:15.800 --> 00:28:20.190
 corals have already been
 lost, thanks to us.
 
 00:28:20.190 --> 00:28:23.293
 And the rest may be claimed
 by ocean acidification.
 
 00:28:23.293 --> 00:28:27.766
 
 
 00:28:27.766 --> 00:28:30.390
 The organisms I\'m particularly
 interested in are the hard
 
 00:28:30.390 --> 00:28:34.650
 corals that build a limestone
 skeleton from dissolved
 
 00:28:34.650 --> 00:28:37.550
 calcium and carbonate ions
 in the seawater.
 
 00:28:37.550 --> 00:28:41.170
 And as the oceans become more
 acidic, the carbonate ion
 
 00:28:41.170 --> 00:28:44.230
 concentration declines, and
 that\'s really why the corals
 
 00:28:44.230 --> 00:28:45.480
 are sensitive to it.
 
 00:28:45.480 --> 00:28:51.480
 
 
 00:28:51.480 --> 00:28:57.060
 And Langdon\'s experiments show
 just how sensitive they are.
 
 00:28:57.060 --> 00:29:00.700
 He\'s been studying different
 hard corals, placing them in
 
 00:29:00.700 --> 00:29:03.540
 tanks at different
 acidity levels.
 
 00:29:03.540 --> 00:29:06.960
 One normal, the other at levels
 predicted for the end
 
 00:29:06.960 --> 00:29:09.090
 of this century.
 
 00:29:09.090 --> 00:29:13.970
 And his measurements tell
 a distressing story.
 
 00:29:13.970 --> 00:29:16.750
 The corals all look healthy.
 
 00:29:16.750 --> 00:29:22.820
 But in high acidity, growth
 rates plummet by 40 to 60%.
 
 00:29:22.820 --> 00:29:26.540
 And if levels climb even higher,
 corals will stop
 
 00:29:26.540 --> 00:29:31.490
 growing altogether and
 eventually erode away, perhaps
 
 00:29:31.490 --> 00:29:34.000
 never to be replaced.
 
 00:29:34.000 --> 00:29:36.340
 Because acidification
 may affect
 
 00:29:36.340 --> 00:29:39.550
 their ability to reproduce.
 
 00:29:39.550 --> 00:29:43.820
 And reproduction is one of the
 most miraculous cycles in a
 
 00:29:43.820 --> 00:29:45.070
 coral\'s life.
 
 00:29:45.070 --> 00:29:51.000
 
 
 00:29:51.000 --> 00:29:54.210
 With their visual sensors timed
 to the light of the
 
 00:29:54.210 --> 00:29:58.870
 moon, corals release
 their spawn.
 
 00:29:58.870 --> 00:30:03.190
 They do it on the same night
 at virtually the same time,
 
 00:30:03.190 --> 00:30:06.585
 and only when the water is just
 at the right temperature.
 
 00:30:06.585 --> 00:30:25.390
 
 
 00:30:25.390 --> 00:30:29.540
 They release their larvae during
 new moons or full moons
 
 00:30:29.540 --> 00:30:31.970
 during just a few months
 out of the year.
 
 00:30:31.970 --> 00:30:35.440
 Other colonies of the same
 species remotely are doing the
 
 00:30:35.440 --> 00:30:36.220
 same thing.
 
 00:30:36.220 --> 00:30:38.620
 So there\'s an opportunity
 for the eggs and
 
 00:30:38.620 --> 00:30:39.800
 sperm to come together.
 
 00:30:39.800 --> 00:30:43.980
 Because otherwise the ocean\'s
 a very vast space.
 
 00:30:43.980 --> 00:30:47.930
 Given that vast space, it\'s
 no surprise that juvenile
 
 00:30:47.930 --> 00:30:52.570
 survival rates may be
 as low as 1 to 6%.
 
 00:30:52.570 --> 00:30:56.400
 And new research in Langdon\'s
 lab suggests that numbers will
 
 00:30:56.400 --> 00:30:59.775
 plunge even further as acidity
 levels increase.
 
 00:30:59.775 --> 00:31:03.490
 
 
 00:31:03.490 --> 00:31:06.540
 If the replacement rate by
 sexual reproduction doesn\'t
 
 00:31:06.540 --> 00:31:09.730
 keep up, then populations
 are just doomed to
 
 00:31:09.730 --> 00:31:10.980
 decline over time.
 
 00:31:10.980 --> 00:31:14.050
 
 
 00:31:14.050 --> 00:31:18.350
 And that could spell disaster
 for countless species,
 
 00:31:18.350 --> 00:31:19.600
 including ours.
 
 00:31:19.600 --> 00:31:25.730
 
 
 00:31:25.730 --> 00:31:28.640
 About a quarter of all the fish
 life in the ocean spends
 
 00:31:28.640 --> 00:31:33.410
 some part of their life
 cycle on a reef.
 
 00:31:33.410 --> 00:31:35.870
 A lot of people depend, for
 quite a large share of their
 
 00:31:35.870 --> 00:31:39.950
 protein, on the fish they
 catch on the reef.
 
 00:31:39.950 --> 00:31:43.480
 I hope people can understand
 this, and realize that food
 
 00:31:43.480 --> 00:31:45.650
 just doesn\'t come
 from a store.
 
 00:31:45.650 --> 00:31:49.570
 It comes from real live plants
 and animals that need clean
 
 00:31:49.570 --> 00:31:52.650
 air, clean water to survive
 just as we do.
 
 00:31:52.650 --> 00:31:54.329
 And we need to take
 care of them.
 
 00:31:54.329 --> 00:32:00.430
 
 
 00:32:00.430 --> 00:32:03.670
 And if we don\'t take care,
 it won\'t just be
 
 00:32:03.670 --> 00:32:05.680
 coral reefs that suffer.
 
 00:32:05.680 --> 00:32:09.300
 Because acidification could
 destroy some of the most
 
 00:32:09.300 --> 00:32:11.820
 important creatures
 in the global sea.
 
 00:32:11.820 --> 00:32:17.210
 
 
 00:32:17.210 --> 00:32:21.170
 They\'re called zooplankton, tiny
 animals that sit at the
 
 00:32:21.170 --> 00:32:22.815
 heart of the ocean food web.
 
 00:32:22.815 --> 00:32:25.680
 
 
 00:32:25.680 --> 00:32:29.740
 Some, like these delicate
 snails, form shells.
 
 00:32:29.740 --> 00:32:34.330
 It\'s just one variety of
 Terapod, a species eaten by so
 
 00:32:34.330 --> 00:32:37.100
 many other creatures, they\'re
 called the potato
 
 00:32:37.100 --> 00:32:38.350
 chips of the sea.
 
 00:32:38.350 --> 00:32:44.550
 
 
 00:32:44.550 --> 00:32:49.140
 And that\'s why plankton expert
 Dave Mackos is so worried.
 
 00:32:49.140 --> 00:32:53.070
 If their shells dissolve, a
 critical part of the food web
 
 00:32:53.070 --> 00:32:54.830
 dissolves with them.
 
 00:32:54.830 --> 00:32:58.630
 And here in the North Pacific,
 surface waters are becoming
 
 00:32:58.630 --> 00:32:59.910
 more and more acidic.
 
 00:32:59.910 --> 00:33:05.260
 
 
 00:33:05.260 --> 00:33:07.460
 The parts of the ocean that
 they live in are becoming
 
 00:33:07.460 --> 00:33:11.100
 corrosive for their shells.
 
 00:33:11.100 --> 00:33:14.940
 The area and the fraction of
 the year that the water is
 
 00:33:14.940 --> 00:33:18.730
 going to be corrosive, if we
 keep dumping CO2 into the
 
 00:33:18.730 --> 00:33:22.410
 atmosphere and into the ocean,
 the amount of available
 
 00:33:22.410 --> 00:33:25.870
 habitat for these things is
 going to get smaller, and
 
 00:33:25.870 --> 00:33:29.620
 smaller, and smaller,
 and smaller.
 
 00:33:29.620 --> 00:33:32.670
 For years, Mackos and his
 colleagues have been
 
 00:33:32.670 --> 00:33:36.750
 conducting plankton tows off
 the BC coast, monitoring
 
 00:33:36.750 --> 00:33:38.670
 various populations.
 
 00:33:38.670 --> 00:33:42.560
 And their findings suggest that
 every aspect of climate
 
 00:33:42.560 --> 00:33:46.890
 change, from warming to
 acidification, is hammering
 
 00:33:46.890 --> 00:33:49.460
 the Terapod population.
 
 00:33:49.460 --> 00:33:53.680
 In one of our longest time
 series, it does look like the
 
 00:33:53.680 --> 00:33:56.170
 Terapods have declined.
 
 00:33:56.170 --> 00:33:59.030
 We are changing the temperature
 of the world.
 
 00:33:59.030 --> 00:34:01.880
 We are changing the chemistry
 of the ocean.
 
 00:34:01.880 --> 00:34:07.380
 So I think it\'s actually a bit
 of a mistake to say, what is
 
 00:34:07.380 --> 00:34:09.199
 the one smoking gun?
 
 00:34:09.199 --> 00:34:12.980
 It\'s kind of like asking, if the
 apocalypse is coming, are
 
 00:34:12.980 --> 00:34:17.190
 you worried about the war, the
 famine, or the pestilence?
 
 00:34:17.190 --> 00:34:18.230
 Which one\'s going to kill you?
 
 00:34:18.230 --> 00:34:20.949
 Well, any one of them could.
 
 00:34:20.949 --> 00:34:24.960
 And together, their cumulative
 effect is almost certainly far
 
 00:34:24.960 --> 00:34:28.980
 worse than their individual
 effect.
 
 00:34:28.980 --> 00:34:33.030
 And Terapods aren\'t the only
 creatures on the front line.
 
 00:34:33.030 --> 00:34:35.880
 
 
 00:34:35.880 --> 00:34:39.570
 Other plankton species build
 protective shells.
 
 00:34:39.570 --> 00:34:43.440
 And if they disappear, the
 bottom of the food chain will
 
 00:34:43.440 --> 00:34:44.690
 take a major hit.
 
 00:34:44.690 --> 00:34:51.179
 
 
 00:34:51.179 --> 00:34:55.520
 Certainly if we affect the base
 of the food chain, that
 
 00:34:55.520 --> 00:34:59.030
 will have a dramatic impact on
 the top of the food chain that
 
 00:34:59.030 --> 00:35:00.300
 we are concerned about.
 
 00:35:00.300 --> 00:35:04.890
 The fish, the mammals, the
 birds, that we know and love.
 
 00:35:04.890 --> 00:35:07.640
 The whales are directly
 dependent on the food
 
 00:35:07.640 --> 00:35:10.478
 resources from the base
 of the food chain.
 
 00:35:10.478 --> 00:35:16.110
 
 
 00:35:16.110 --> 00:35:19.270
 There was a mass extinction
 55 million years ago.
 
 00:35:19.270 --> 00:35:21.910
 And the oceans became acidic.
 
 00:35:21.910 --> 00:35:26.000
 But the difference now is that
 our experiment, we\'re burning
 
 00:35:26.000 --> 00:35:27.900
 carbon so rapidly.
 
 00:35:27.900 --> 00:35:30.160
 We\'re doing this at least
 10 times faster than
 
 00:35:30.160 --> 00:35:32.860
 any time in the past.
 
 00:35:32.860 --> 00:35:34.350
 Maybe 30 times faster.
 
 00:35:34.350 --> 00:35:35.600
 That\'s what we estimate.
 
 00:35:35.600 --> 00:35:38.900
 
 
 00:35:38.900 --> 00:35:42.810
 And the geological record shows
 fairly clearly that in
 
 00:35:42.810 --> 00:35:46.050
 many cases, many of these
 species, particularly the
 
 00:35:46.050 --> 00:35:48.230
 calcifying species and
 the coral reef
 
 00:35:48.230 --> 00:35:50.780
 species, went extinct.
 
 00:35:50.780 --> 00:35:53.970
 And those ecosystems
 had to re-evolve.
 
 00:35:53.970 --> 00:35:57.370
 Had to start over again and
 re-evolve, taking anywhere
 
 00:35:57.370 --> 00:36:00.390
 from two to 10 million years
 for that to occur.
 
 00:36:00.390 --> 00:36:05.310
 
 
 00:36:05.310 --> 00:36:08.930
 The cause of those past
 extinctions seems to have been
 
 00:36:08.930 --> 00:36:12.890
 massive volcanic eruptions that
 filled the atmosphere,
 
 00:36:12.890 --> 00:36:16.900
 then the ocean, with
 carbon dioxide.
 
 00:36:16.900 --> 00:36:21.360
 The future cause may be us.
 
 00:36:21.360 --> 00:36:25.080
 So is mass extinction
 the inevitable fate
 
 00:36:25.080 --> 00:36:27.930
 of the global sea?
 
 00:36:27.930 --> 00:36:32.110
 The waters near an ancient
 Mediterranean volcano may hold
 
 00:36:32.110 --> 00:36:33.360
 the answer.
 
 00:36:33.360 --> 00:36:42.680
 
 
 00:36:42.680 --> 00:36:46.820
 It towers like a menacing giant
 over the city of Naples
 
 00:36:46.820 --> 00:36:49.530
 and the Mediterranean Sea.
 
 00:36:49.530 --> 00:36:54.140
 Vesuvius is still an active
 volcano, and its impact can be
 
 00:36:54.140 --> 00:36:57.130
 felt 30 kilometers away
 in the waters off
 
 00:36:57.130 --> 00:36:58.380
 the island of Ischia.
 
 00:36:58.380 --> 00:37:05.800
 
 
 00:37:05.800 --> 00:37:10.140
 Marine ecologist Jason Hall
 Spencer has been studying the
 
 00:37:10.140 --> 00:37:12.820
 ocean just off the
 Ischian coast.
 
 00:37:12.820 --> 00:37:16.260
 And what he\'s discovered
 may be a microcosm
 
 00:37:16.260 --> 00:37:19.040
 of the future sea.
 
 00:37:19.040 --> 00:37:24.600
 Thanks to Vesuvius, this small
 patch of ocean is saturated
 
 00:37:24.600 --> 00:37:25.850
 with carbon dioxide.
 
 00:37:25.850 --> 00:37:29.330
 
 
 00:37:29.330 --> 00:37:31.080
 It\'s pretty amazing to
 look at, actually.
 
 00:37:31.080 --> 00:37:33.120
 Because there\'s a load of
 bubbles bubbling up from the
 
 00:37:33.120 --> 00:37:34.630
 sea bed with the
 carbon dioxide.
 
 00:37:34.630 --> 00:37:36.590
 And the reason that\'s happening
 is that chalk is
 
 00:37:36.590 --> 00:37:40.350
 being boiled by the volcano of
 Vesuvius, the famous volcano.
 
 00:37:40.350 --> 00:37:42.460
 It\'s driving this chalk up and
 it\'s coming up at normal
 
 00:37:42.460 --> 00:37:43.175
 temperature.
 
 00:37:43.175 --> 00:37:45.490
 But it\'s acidifying the water
 around it, just like we\'re
 
 00:37:45.490 --> 00:37:48.610
 doing to the planet worldwide
 with increasing CO2.
 
 00:37:48.610 --> 00:37:50.260
 And this is a way of looking
 into the future of the
 
 00:37:50.260 --> 00:37:51.200
 planet\'s ecosystems.
 
 00:37:51.200 --> 00:37:53.540
 Because naturally, this
 area has been
 
 00:37:53.540 --> 00:37:56.130
 acidified for millennia.
 
 00:37:56.130 --> 00:37:59.890
 Today, Hall Spencer and his
 colleagues are heading out to
 
 00:37:59.890 --> 00:38:03.870
 the CO2 vents to collect
 specimens and check on an
 
 00:38:03.870 --> 00:38:08.170
 experiment being conducted by
 sea grass expert, Maria
 
 00:38:08.170 --> 00:38:12.950
 Cristina Buia It\'s just one of
 many studies they\'ve done
 
 00:38:12.950 --> 00:38:16.890
 assessing the impact of carbon
 dioxide on everything from
 
 00:38:16.890 --> 00:38:20.600
 plankton and shellfish to
 corals and urchins.
 
 00:38:20.600 --> 00:38:24.040
 I think we know anyway that the
 CO2 increases the growth
 
 00:38:24.040 --> 00:38:24.710
 of the sea grass.
 
 00:38:24.710 --> 00:38:28.970
 But we want to know how the
 knock-on affects the other
 
 00:38:28.970 --> 00:38:30.220
 marine life.
 
 00:38:30.220 --> 00:38:41.580
 
 
 00:38:41.580 --> 00:38:42.830
 Go.
 
 00:38:42.830 --> 00:38:48.520
 
 
 00:38:48.520 --> 00:38:52.720
 At first glance, it looks like
 a lush green environment.
 
 00:38:52.720 --> 00:38:55.130
 But look a little closer,
 and another
 
 00:38:55.130 --> 00:38:57.650
 picture begins to emerge.
 
 00:38:57.650 --> 00:39:02.240
 Because of the CO2 bubbling into
 these sea grass beds, the
 
 00:39:02.240 --> 00:39:06.220
 acidity level here is close to
 that predicted for the end of
 
 00:39:06.220 --> 00:39:08.540
 the century.
 
 00:39:08.540 --> 00:39:12.620
 Sea grass loves this
 environment, because all that
 
 00:39:12.620 --> 00:39:15.200
 CO2 acts like a fertilizer.
 
 00:39:15.200 --> 00:39:20.390
 But Hall Spencer has conducted
 detailed animal surveys here,
 
 00:39:20.390 --> 00:39:23.240
 and the results are troubling.
 
 00:39:23.240 --> 00:39:25.810
 We\'ve actually counted every
 single organism we can find.
 
 00:39:25.810 --> 00:39:28.350
 And we found that\'s there\'s a
 30% reduction, a crash in the
 
 00:39:28.350 --> 00:39:30.010
 biodiversity of the area.
 
 00:39:30.010 --> 00:39:32.720
 All the things that should be
 there, reproducing and growing
 
 00:39:32.720 --> 00:39:34.010
 well, have gone.
 
 00:39:34.010 --> 00:39:37.940
 And it\'s like comparing a
 desert to a rainforest.
 
 00:39:37.940 --> 00:39:41.073
 And the shelled creatures that
 do make their way into the
 
 00:39:41.073 --> 00:39:43.030
 vents don\'t last long.
 
 00:39:43.030 --> 00:39:46.325
 
 
 00:39:46.325 --> 00:39:50.285
 [SPEAKING FOREIGN LANGUAGE]
 
 00:39:50.285 --> 00:39:52.770
 Thanks.
 
 00:39:52.770 --> 00:39:55.080
 I tried to collect
 these intact.
 
 00:39:55.080 --> 00:39:57.910
 Normally with a limpet, you
 can get the whole animal.
 
 00:39:57.910 --> 00:39:58.610
 Yeah.
 
 00:39:58.610 --> 00:39:59.750
 It\'s easy.
 
 00:39:59.750 --> 00:40:01.830
 But these, they\'re so thin.
 
 00:40:01.830 --> 00:40:02.610
 They\'re just--
 
 00:40:02.610 --> 00:40:03.300
 [INAUDIBLE] broke, yeah.
 
 00:40:03.300 --> 00:40:04.350
 Yeah, they\'re just breaking
 in my hands.
 
 00:40:04.350 --> 00:40:05.255
 They just open up.
 
 00:40:05.255 --> 00:40:05.630
 You know?
 
 00:40:05.630 --> 00:40:07.450
 That\'s [INAUDIBLE].
 
 00:40:07.450 --> 00:40:08.800
 Yes.
 
 00:40:08.800 --> 00:40:10.490
 They have recruited into the
 [? cycling because there\'s ?]
 
 00:40:10.490 --> 00:40:12.640
 lots of food.
 
 00:40:12.640 --> 00:40:15.380
 Fertilized by this here too,
 but it\'s their graveyard.
 
 00:40:15.380 --> 00:40:16.200
 They just dissolve.
 
 00:40:16.200 --> 00:40:17.484
 They don\'t resist.
 
 00:40:17.484 --> 00:40:19.180
 No.
 
 00:40:19.180 --> 00:40:21.760
 But strangely enough,
 there are still
 
 00:40:21.760 --> 00:40:25.090
 fish in these waters.
 
 00:40:25.090 --> 00:40:27.290
 Certainly when you see these
 sites with fish swimming
 
 00:40:27.290 --> 00:40:29.730
 around through the CO2 bubbles,
 then maybe the whole
 
 00:40:29.730 --> 00:40:31.530
 fishing industry will breathe
 a huge sigh of relief.
 
 00:40:31.530 --> 00:40:34.005
 Go, OK, there\'s plenty of
 fish in the future.
 
 00:40:34.005 --> 00:40:36.540
 It doesn\'t matter how much CO2
 you pump into the sea.
 
 00:40:36.540 --> 00:40:38.060
 Unfortunately, that\'s
 a false view.
 
 00:40:38.060 --> 00:40:41.000
 What\'s happening is the fish are
 able to swim in and out of
 
 00:40:41.000 --> 00:40:43.980
 this very high CO2 area that
 we\'ve got here, but they
 
 00:40:43.980 --> 00:40:45.480
 cannot reproduce there.
 
 00:40:45.480 --> 00:40:48.540
 And some experiments that are
 going on at my laboratory show
 
 00:40:48.540 --> 00:40:51.620
 that the very early life history
 stages of fish are
 
 00:40:51.620 --> 00:40:52.580
 vulnerable in their
 
 00:40:52.580 --> 00:40:54.140
 development to high CO2 levels.
 
 00:40:54.140 --> 00:40:59.610
 
 
 00:40:59.610 --> 00:41:02.610
 While I\'m saying I don\'t know
 what the future is, what I can
 
 00:41:02.610 --> 00:41:05.000
 do is say that the sites
 we\'re studying, it
 
 00:41:05.000 --> 00:41:05.680
 doesn\'t look good.
 
 00:41:05.680 --> 00:41:08.590
 And if we carry on doing what
 we\'re doing, it looks bad.
 
 00:41:08.590 --> 00:41:10.660
 Because, for example,
 corals have gone.
 
 00:41:10.660 --> 00:41:14.570
 For example, all of the
 calcified organisms have gone.
 
 00:41:14.570 --> 00:41:16.820
 And that\'s bound to affect the
 whole food chain, right up to
 
 00:41:16.820 --> 00:41:18.070
 fish and mankind.
 
 00:41:18.070 --> 00:41:22.430
 
 
 00:41:22.430 --> 00:41:26.630
 And if that chain of life
 unravels, then the nurturing
 
 00:41:26.630 --> 00:41:31.550
 sea, the one that gave us life,
 will change beyond all
 
 00:41:31.550 --> 00:41:32.800
 recognition.
 
 00:41:32.800 --> 00:41:47.980
 
 
 00:41:47.980 --> 00:41:51.940
 Previously, the oceans were able
 to adjust and buffer the
 
 00:41:51.940 --> 00:41:55.320
 effects of high CO2, so the
 pH didn\'t alter so much.
 
 00:41:55.320 --> 00:41:58.210
 But now, we\'re ramping it up
 so quickly that it cannot
 
 00:41:58.210 --> 00:42:00.270
 adjust in time.
 
 00:42:00.270 --> 00:42:03.680
 So if we can just for goodness
 sake, reduce the amount of CO2
 
 00:42:03.680 --> 00:42:06.740
 and the amount of energy we
 consume, then that\'s going to
 
 00:42:06.740 --> 00:42:08.740
 benefit the oceans worldwide.
 
 00:42:08.740 --> 00:42:13.120
 
 
 00:42:13.120 --> 00:42:17.520
 The decisions that we make in
 our generation over the next
 
 00:42:17.520 --> 00:42:22.300
 20 to 30 years, will impact
 hundreds of generations of
 
 00:42:22.300 --> 00:42:25.610
 mankind in the future.
 
 00:42:25.610 --> 00:42:27.340
 So we better get this right.
 
 00:42:27.340 --> 00:42:30.250
 And we better get this
 right right now.
 
 00:42:30.250 --> 00:42:32.180
 I\'m a father and
 a grandfather.
 
 00:42:32.180 --> 00:42:43.255
 And I\'m very concerned that we
 leave this for them in a state
 
 00:42:43.255 --> 00:42:48.960
 that they can appreciate,
 that they can utilize.
 
 00:42:48.960 --> 00:42:52.275
 Not one where they look back
 and say, this generation
 
 00:42:52.275 --> 00:42:53.564
 didn\'t do its job.
 
 00:42:53.564 --> 00:42:57.080
 
 
 00:42:57.080 --> 00:43:00.860
 So how will our generation
 be remembered?
 
 00:43:00.860 --> 00:43:04.950
 Perhaps as one that formed a new
 partnership with the ocean
 
 00:43:04.950 --> 00:43:07.640
 and its astonishing creatures.
 
 00:43:07.640 --> 00:43:12.480
 If not, then it may be us and
 thousands of other species
 
 00:43:12.480 --> 00:43:16.660
 that pay the ultimate price.
 
 00:43:16.660 --> 00:43:21.470
 The ocean will endure with or
 without us, source waters of
 
 00:43:21.470 --> 00:43:24.395
 the planet, and the cradle
 of new life.
 
 00:43:24.395 --> 00:44:01.920
Distributor: Bullfrog Films
Length: 44 minutes
Date: 2012
Genre: Expository
Language: English
Grade: 8-12, College, Adult
		Color/BW: 
		 
	
Closed Captioning: Available
Audio description: Available
Interactive Transcript: Available
Existing customers, please log in to view this film.
New to Docuseek? Register to request a quote.
 
		 
		