An exploration of artist Sol LeWitt's work and philosophy.
Views on Vermeer
- Description
- Reviews
- Citation
- Cataloging
- Transcript
Johannes Vermeer died nearly 350 years ago, but his work continues to evoke inspiration and passion.
Shot largely in New York (home to a third of the world's Vermeer paintings) VIEWS ON VERMEER also travels to Holland, France, London and Washington, introducing us to artists, writers and photographers whose lives and work have been touched by the painter from Delft.
Vermeer has long been admired for the sense of peacefulness that infuses his work. Dutch photographer Erwin Olaf says what he has learned about portraiture from Vermeer is that 'nothing really happens.' One woman reads a letter. Another pours milk. Both their actions are captured in a moment of stillness. 'A life is being lived in those paintings-a small moment,' says photographer Joel Meyerowitz. 'That small moment is where Vermeer and photography meet.'
The film highlights artists whose work is directly inspired by Vermeer, and others for whom the connection to the old master is less direct, yet no less vital.
London-based painter Tom Hunter's work depicts friends and neighbors facing eviction from their homes in compositions drawn from Vermeer. Meanwhile, photographers such as Meyerowitz and Philip-Lorca diCorcia draw on Vermeer more indirectly. diCorcia's 'Hustlers' series features male prostitutes posed in tableaus whose lighting and compositions are reminiscent of Vermeer's. And as in Vermeer's work, diCorcia's images 'reveal themselves slowly.'
One of the more striking sequences in the film juxtaposes the work of Girl with a Pearl Earring novelist Tracy Chevalier with that of Steve McCurry-the photographer who shot the famous Afghan girl photo that appeared on the cover of National Geographic. For Chevalier, the Vermeer painting on which she based the book was not simply a portrait; it captured a moment in a relationship. McCurry compares the Afghan girl-seeing a western male for the first time-to the girl with the pearl earring. Each demonstrates a moment when 'the mundane becomes magical.'
Despite the peacefulness of his work, Vermeer lived in a world wracked by violence. Writer Lawrence Weschler ( Vermeer in Bosnia ) notes that the sense of calm in a painting of Vermeer's hometown-where a recent explosion had killed hundreds-is akin to a portrait of post-9/11 Manhattan. The sense of peacefulness filling the work is not simply aesthetic. It is a political statement wrenched from a world at war.
Many of those featured in the film point to the lack of verisimilitude in much of Vermeer's work. Bricks may not really look the way Vermeer paints them. Certain reflections and highlights may be physically impossible. Yet his work captures something fundamental about reality-something beyond the purely physical. We are surrounded by inexpensive digital equipment that offers the illusion of instantly photographing or filming reality. The work of Vermeer and the artists he has influenced is an invitation to the opposite approach. As artist Chuck Close says, 'Vermeer painted the situation of bricks, rather than individual bricks.'
Featuring interviews with painters Tom Hunter, Chuck Close, and Jonathan Janson; photographers Erwin Olaf, Philip-Lorca diCorcia, Joel Meyerowitz and Steve McCurry; writers Tracy Chevalier, Lawrence Weschler, and Alain de Botton; architect Philip Steadman; curators Walter Liedtke, and Arthur Wheelock; art historian Geoffrey Batchen, and art dealer Otto Naumann.
'VIEWS ON VERMEER provides thought provoking viewing for both the general and academic audience, and offers a gentle, comfortable 'exercise of the brain' that sparks a desire for more contemplation and discussion.' -Educational Media Reviews Online, February 2012
'Much of the film is quite marvelous: relaxed yet lively, modest but confident. It's like a series of bracing conversations about an endlessly interesting subject.' -Mark Feeney, The Boston Globe
**** 'VIEWS ON VERMEER is a delightful, impressionistic meditation on the many ways the elusive and allusive Vermeer continues to inform, inspire and provoke the contemporary imagination.' -The Globe and Mail
'Required viewing for any Vermeer fan.' -NOW Magazine
'One of the very best [films ever made about art].' -The Star
Citation
Main credits
Pool, Hans (Director)
Pool, Hans (Cinematographer)
Wilt, Koos de (Director)
Lagestee, Martin (Producer)
Other credits
Editor, Maalk Krijgsman.
Distributor subjects
Art; Artists; Painting; Cultural StudiesKeywords
WEBVTT
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:38.000
[music]
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:20.000
[sil.]
00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:29.999
Okay. Umm… I think the first time
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:34.999
I actually saw Vermeer’s work was actually
in a book. Yeah, this is a painting
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:39.999
that starts through a loaf.
00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:44.999
I mean, look at these people, you get a
glimpse of the dignity, you get a glimpse of
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:49.999
these peoples importance. Actually you look at
them and feel, wow, these are amazing people.
00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:54.999
I could actually be that person. And
for me, Vermeer was the first person
00:01:55.000 --> 00:01:59.999
who redid that. He pictures ordinary
people, not the Kings, not the Queens,
00:02:00.000 --> 00:02:04.999
not the Jukes, not the Popes,
but the ordinary people.
00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:09.999
Do you mind get it down?
00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:14.999
So this… this actually describes the street
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:19.999
where I was living for 15 years and
they call it the Ghetto, squatting,
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:24.999
fly tipping, wish I’d be dead (inaudible) area for
years will be arrested, a blot on the landscape,
00:02:25.000 --> 00:02:29.999
why would people want to live there anyway.
Every painting
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:34.999
that I found by Vermeer in the books,
I’ll go, well, that looks like,
00:02:35.000 --> 00:02:39.999
Jim or Fred or whoever is
on my street, or Clare or,
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:44.999
so I would take, I would have the Vermeer book and I’ll
come visit a friend. If I’m going to do this project,
00:02:45.000 --> 00:02:49.999
I want to reshow the dignity of the
people around here, we want to portray
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:54.999
the beauty of this street and its people.
00:02:55.000 --> 00:03:03.000
[music]
00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:14.999
I suppose the idea came from… from looking at
my local newspaper and in local newspaper,
00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:19.999
it always showed squatters. People living in
abandon houses, in very black and white pictures,
00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:24.999
black and white grainy photograph, always
wilt them bang, evacuated from their houses.
00:03:25.000 --> 00:03:29.999
And every time you look at these pictures and the people,
you thought these are (inaudible) but they’re not like me.
00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:34.999
There are people who don’t care, they are anti-social,
they are drug takers, they are criminals.
00:03:35.000 --> 00:03:39.999
Umm… With my experience,
I was very different.
00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:48.000
[music]
00:03:55.000 --> 00:03:59.999
Felipa, who is a very close friend of mine, she’s living
next door. When we saw this picture, just seem to fit her.
00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:04.999
It’s very beautiful face, very young
at that time. And I used to just spend
00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:09.999
hours having tea at her house. Watching
the light come through her window
00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:14.999
umm… and with this book just thinking… Well,
actually, you know, it’s half past eleven now,
00:04:15.000 --> 00:04:19.999
the light is coming through this window in such
a beautiful way and hitting that back wall,
00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:24.999
is just like this familiar painting.
These are the letters that came for her
00:04:25.000 --> 00:04:29.999
in the post from the High Court, from the
government to, be removed from our houses
00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:34.999
where we were living at that time. I
think I collected from the whole street.
00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:39.999
I think I collected everyone’s letters that
they… they received from the local government.
00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:44.999
And it always be just a Persons Unknown, they
wouldn’t speak to us by name. The only way
00:04:45.000 --> 00:04:49.999
that I thought, we could actually communicate
with them would be, maybe from my art.
00:04:50.000 --> 00:04:58.000
[sil.]
00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:04.999
And then it gets bought by collectors,
it got bought by Sache(ph),
00:05:05.000 --> 00:05:09.999
and then it’s shown in New York, shown
in Holland, and then people see it
00:05:10.000 --> 00:05:14.999
in a very different way. The text is taken out,
so I think some people who saw this picture
00:05:15.000 --> 00:05:19.999
doesn’t even know this about…
about a struggle, really,
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:24.999
a struggle, in a city, a struggle of people
trying to save their homes and they just see it
00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:29.999
now as a…as a beautiful composition. Which I think
is quite interesting ‘cause now, when you look at
00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:34.999
Vermeer’s painting, people don’t know the whole
story about any of these people in the painting,
00:05:35.000 --> 00:05:40.000
so they make up their own story.
00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:58.000
[music]
00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:04.999
Kind of slurs in, and people who really are very involved
in the arts they know they’re more of Vermeer’s in New York
00:06:05.000 --> 00:06:09.999
than any other place in the
world, tonight it’s one third
00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:14.999
of the artist known production the most.
00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:19.999
He’s… he’s just can’t paint that well.
I mean, he’s not the very best
00:06:20.000 --> 00:06:24.999
handler of shadows, for
instance, and as Rembrandt is,
00:06:25.000 --> 00:06:29.999
by far, he has no emotional context
00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:34.999
whatsoever compared to Rembrandt, not at
all. And he is technically not as good as
00:06:35.000 --> 00:06:39.999
Gerard Dou, Frans I Meiris, Metsu,
a whole host of other artists.
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:44.999
He’s technically not as proficient.
Meaning, if this
00:06:45.000 --> 00:06:49.999
artist is good as he is, could just give you the
idea of blood rather than exactly, exactly blood.
00:06:50.000 --> 00:06:54.999
You wouldn’t… you wouldn’t be asking
questions like, it looks a little thin
00:06:55.000 --> 00:06:59.999
or it looks like wax is stripping or it
looks like. No Vermeer would show you
00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:04.999
the idea of blood being there. He never did that in
the painting but he certainly would be capable of it.
00:07:05.000 --> 00:07:09.999
And many Old Masters, they leave nothing
to the imagination, Vermeer leaves
00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:14.999
everything to the imagination, in the subject
of his paintings and the way they are painted.
00:07:15.000 --> 00:07:20.000
[music]
00:07:25.000 --> 00:07:33.000
[music]
00:07:50.000 --> 00:07:54.999
You know, I can decode just about
any painting. If I look at it,
00:07:55.000 --> 00:07:59.999
I can figure out how it got made.
But his paintings are
00:08:00.000 --> 00:08:04.999
like they were blown on the canvas,
uh… with the breath of air.
00:08:05.000 --> 00:08:09.999
I mean, it’s just floated on there.
It’s very hard to figure out
00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:14.999
umm… how he did them. And they are
very, very from his contemporaries.
00:08:15.000 --> 00:08:19.999
There was an exhibition at the Met,
called the Vermeer’s contemporaries.
00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:24.999
And in a very large room,
there were comparisons
00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:29.999
between Hawk and Vermeer.
Umm… And from across the room
00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:34.999
uh…the… What they had like
00:08:35.000 --> 00:08:39.999
Vermeer’s little street with red brick
building, next to a similar Hawk.
00:08:40.000 --> 00:08:44.999
And from across the room it looked
like light was coming through it.
00:08:45.000 --> 00:08:49.999
And the Hawk was just paint,
00:08:50.000 --> 00:08:54.999
and Vermeer painted the situation of bricks
00:08:55.000 --> 00:08:59.999
rather than painting
individual bricks. For me,
00:09:00.000 --> 00:09:04.999
umm… he didn’t paint
stuff, he painted light.
00:09:05.000 --> 00:09:09.999
New York city dust, it
doesn’t hurt a painting.
00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:14.999
This is one of a fine Schiller painting.
00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:19.999
A painting that…that, you know, is painted
with this ultra, ultra, ultra touch,
00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:24.999
right? I mean, I find it a bit ugly, there’s no question
about it. Look at the lady’s face, it’s very unpleasant.
00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:29.999
Vermeer will give you a crumpled up carpet
00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:34.999
and but he will never indicate it with
that kind of precision. He didn’t need to.
00:09:35.000 --> 00:09:39.999
He knows that your brain is working
on making that look like a carpet.
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:48.000
[music]
00:10:25.000 --> 00:10:30.000
[music]
00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:43.000
[music]
00:11:05.000 --> 00:11:10.000
[music]
00:11:30.000 --> 00:11:35.000
[sil.]
00:12:40.000 --> 00:12:45.000
[sil.]
00:13:00.000 --> 00:13:08.000
[sil.]
00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:38.000
[music]
00:14:50.000 --> 00:14:58.000
[music]
00:15:10.000 --> 00:15:18.000
[sil.]
00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:24.999
It’s a series done in Hollywood.
00:15:25.000 --> 00:15:29.999
Subjects were all male prostitutes.
00:15:30.000 --> 00:15:34.999
Uh… I generally pick the
location first and then
00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:39.999
we’d set up lights and situation and
then I would leave my assistant there
00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:44.999
with everything in place and go to the
street where the male prostitutes work.
00:15:45.000 --> 00:15:49.999
And I would ask them
00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:54.999
if they would pose and I would pay them
00:15:55.000 --> 00:15:59.999
and I would bring them there.
And they would almost always
00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:04.999
do the exact same thing
that I had pre arranged.
00:16:05.000 --> 00:16:13.000
[music]
00:16:30.000 --> 00:16:38.000
[music]
00:16:40.000 --> 00:16:44.999
I think there’s something in feeling about voyeurism, which is
also a feeling Vermeer’s work as if… if we are fly on a wall
00:16:45.000 --> 00:16:49.999
and we’re seeing something that we’re normally not ready
to. Almost like a God looking in on this little scene,
00:16:50.000 --> 00:16:54.999
that we’re not, being effect not supposed to be
seen. I think it’s the same in De Corsi’s work,
00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:59.999
as we’re looking into people’s faces who are not aware
we’re looking, we’re not prepared for that look.
00:17:00.000 --> 00:17:08.000
[music]
00:17:15.000 --> 00:17:19.999
This one is more interesting because it’s…
00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:24.999
it’s just not trying so hard.
Reminds me of the way Vermeer
00:17:25.000 --> 00:17:29.999
sets up his foregrounds often with
curtains or tapestries as if we’re
00:17:30.000 --> 00:17:34.999
folding back kind of a stage set to see what’s going
on inside. And even the way that took us here
00:17:35.000 --> 00:17:39.999
is divided of the space here. It’s very
old, very Dutch in a way, at least
00:17:40.000 --> 00:17:44.999
the 17th century pictures and then we have this sort
of sense of divided space, space continuing up,
00:17:45.000 --> 00:17:49.999
for example through the
window, into the world.
00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:54.999
I want that it to be an image
that could be seen to be made by
00:17:55.000 --> 00:17:59.999
a neutral party, someone who’s not
involved in what you are looking at,
00:18:00.000 --> 00:18:04.999
uh… and very often the point of view
00:18:05.000 --> 00:18:09.999
and the camera effects are…are not,
00:18:10.000 --> 00:18:14.999
are something that you would
never do in a…in a snap shot.
00:18:15.000 --> 00:18:19.999
This…this is in some way taken from
a point of view which suggests that
00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:24.999
somebody else is there looking at it.
00:18:25.000 --> 00:18:29.999
The fact that the inside obscures here
00:18:30.000 --> 00:18:34.999
outside is normally
considered to be, I believe
00:18:35.000 --> 00:18:39.999
bad composition, which is
that obscuring the subject.
00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:44.999
So in a way it’s…
00:18:45.000 --> 00:18:49.999
This is a standard theory of architecture
00:18:50.000 --> 00:18:54.999
that complexity and contradiction
have to adjust at the same time.
00:18:55.000 --> 00:18:59.999
And that makes the viewer work more
00:19:00.000 --> 00:19:04.999
and ask more questions and
ultimately it is my ambition
00:19:05.000 --> 00:19:09.999
to have, as I believe, it
was Vermeer’s the secrets
00:19:10.000 --> 00:19:14.999
of the image reveal themselves slowly.
00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:23.000
[music]
00:19:40.000 --> 00:19:48.000
[non-English narration]
00:19:55.000 --> 00:19:59.999
[music]
00:20:00.000 --> 00:20:04.999
I’m an architect and I teach…
I was teaching perspective.
00:20:05.000 --> 00:20:09.999
I have a class in perspective and
I thought what should we do.
00:20:10.000 --> 00:20:14.999
Let’s work perspective backwards,
let’s take some paintings
00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:19.999
and through the natural
images, and reconstruct
00:20:20.000 --> 00:20:24.999
the three dimensional scenes
that they show. And then I
00:20:25.000 --> 00:20:29.999
saw as anyone must see if they look
at all Vermeer’s painting that,
00:20:30.000 --> 00:20:34.999
in his interiors they seem quite a
number, seem to share the same room.
00:20:35.000 --> 00:20:39.999
[sil.]
00:20:40.000 --> 00:20:44.999
If you take a map or
plan of Vermeer’s room.
00:20:45.000 --> 00:20:49.999
If we’re looking from this end,
00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:54.999
we see a blank wall here
in all these pictures
00:20:55.000 --> 00:20:59.999
and the windows are always on the left, and there’s
three of them and equally spaced (inaudible).
00:21:00.000 --> 00:21:04.999
Okay, so the light comes in the left.
00:21:05.000 --> 00:21:09.999
Now, umm… in the reconstructions
00:21:10.000 --> 00:21:14.999
I’ve made of this room, you can find
the…the view points. And they’re always
00:21:15.000 --> 00:21:19.999
about here, they’re not always in quite the same
place. So here’s one. So that’s the position
00:21:20.000 --> 00:21:24.999
from where Vermeer must have
put his eye to get to the
00:21:25.000 --> 00:21:29.999
correct perspective view. It’s what we see
of the room when we look at the painting,
00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:34.999
it’s using a camera, it’s where you put the
lens. And in each… I’ll just draw one.
00:21:35.000 --> 00:21:39.999
In each painting, you
see a kind of pyramid.
00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:44.999
Umm… This is the extent of all
00:21:45.000 --> 00:21:49.999
that you see in the picture.
00:21:50.000 --> 00:21:58.000
[music]
00:22:05.000 --> 00:22:09.999
Now what I discovered is this. If
you take these lines back here
00:22:10.000 --> 00:22:14.999
to the back wall,
00:22:15.000 --> 00:22:19.999
you get a little rectangle. And in
00:22:20.000 --> 00:22:24.999
six cases and perhaps more, this
rectangle is the exact size
00:22:25.000 --> 00:22:29.999
of the painting of Vermeer’s canvas. I
think it must be to do with the fact
00:22:30.000 --> 00:22:34.999
that he’s using the camera, that he
has the camera booth set up here.
00:22:35.000 --> 00:22:39.999
He’s got his lens, he can move the camera
00:22:40.000 --> 00:22:44.999
or the lens about into
slightly different positions.
00:22:45.000 --> 00:22:49.999
The lens is projecting an image on to
the wall, he is tracing it and it is
00:22:50.000 --> 00:22:54.999
for that reason, that it is the
same size as the painting.
00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:59.999
Now here’s my camera,
00:23:00.000 --> 00:23:04.999
and camera obscura means a dark room,
and this is it, it’s just a booth
00:23:05.000 --> 00:23:09.999
and it has… I can put the lens in here.
00:23:10.000 --> 00:23:14.999
This is an old plate camera and
the reason for having that is
00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:19.999
that you can move it back and
forth and focus the lens.
00:23:20.000 --> 00:23:25.000
And it casts an image on to this screen at the back.
Now pull down the, close it to blacken the room.
00:23:35.000 --> 00:23:43.000
[music]
00:23:45.000 --> 00:23:49.999
It has been suggested in the past that
Vermeer’s realism is explained by basically
00:23:50.000 --> 00:23:54.999
copying that projected image. I do think
Vermeer would have been interested
00:23:55.000 --> 00:23:59.999
in the camera and probably knew about it.
Umm… People like Konstantin,
00:24:00.000 --> 00:24:04.999
Helgeson, the Hague, wrote about the camera
00:24:05.000 --> 00:24:09.999
and others were familiar with it. But
for Vermeer, it probably be essentially
00:24:10.000 --> 00:24:14.999
another way of seeing reality, weather
he’s looking at out the window
00:24:15.000 --> 00:24:19.999
or in a camera or seeing a very realistic
effect in another artist’s work.
00:24:20.000 --> 00:24:24.999
He takes that information back
to the studio and he redoes it
00:24:25.000 --> 00:24:29.999
in his own way. Yes, correct.
00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:34.999
Get the telephone bit here. Yes, that’s
good. Yes. That’s right. Very good, Kim.
00:24:35.000 --> 00:24:39.999
One of the problems with being a painter’s
model is, you have to stay still all the time.
00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:44.999
And Vermeer’s models
seem to be in a position
00:24:45.000 --> 00:24:49.999
where they can keep still.
They don’t seem to be holding
00:24:50.000 --> 00:24:54.999
anything up or they simply resting. Can you just
turn your face a little towards the camera?
00:24:55.000 --> 00:24:59.999
There, perfect. (inaudible) a little.
Yeah, middle, that’s great.
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:04.999
That’s very nice.
00:25:05.000 --> 00:25:09.999
It strikes you immediately once you look
at the camera images like a painting.
00:25:10.000 --> 00:25:14.999
It is… David Hoeppner, who is very
interested in optics and believes that
00:25:15.000 --> 00:25:19.999
painters have used optics over the
centuries. He says to see it is to use it.
00:25:20.000 --> 00:25:24.999
And he means that, it appeals to the
painter’s eye just like a painting
00:25:25.000 --> 00:25:29.999
in some strange way. It’s not because
it’s very detailed. In many ways
00:25:30.000 --> 00:25:34.999
you lose detail. It resolves the
picture into something precise
00:25:35.000 --> 00:25:39.999
but…but vague if you understand me. Something
that is softer than the photograph.
00:25:40.000 --> 00:25:44.999
When you study these light effects
closely you see that many of them
00:25:45.000 --> 00:25:49.999
are very convincing are
in fact not scientific.
00:25:50.000 --> 00:25:54.999
You have the window is opaque,
everywhere except where
00:25:55.000 --> 00:25:59.999
he completes with the hand, the fingers
show through the glass, nothing else does.
00:26:00.000 --> 00:26:04.999
He wants the hand to be complete, but
he doesn’t want any distractions
00:26:05.000 --> 00:26:09.999
out the window. The reflections in the
bottom of the basin of the carpet,
00:26:10.000 --> 00:26:14.999
look like they reflect the carpet directly
00:26:15.000 --> 00:26:19.999
but in fact it’s an invented pattern.
It just has speckles
00:26:20.000 --> 00:26:24.999
of the same color. But I think if you
brought in an optical scientist,
00:26:25.000 --> 00:26:29.999
he would say there’s no
way that would happen.
00:26:30.000 --> 00:26:34.999
There are other features that had to do with,
umm… Vermeer’s treatment of highlights.
00:26:35.000 --> 00:26:39.999
These are the little
reflections, either of the sun
00:26:40.000 --> 00:26:44.999
or of the light coming from windows
that are reflected off shiny surfaces
00:26:45.000 --> 00:26:49.999
like polished wood or metal or glass.
00:26:50.000 --> 00:26:54.999
And they take their shape from the
lights sources that they reflect,
00:26:55.000 --> 00:26:59.999
so that if you are indoors,
they’re usually like a rectangles
00:27:00.000 --> 00:27:04.999
shape of the windows. Vermeer’s
shows them in many cases as
00:27:05.000 --> 00:27:09.999
circles which they’re not.
They would only become circles
00:27:10.000 --> 00:27:14.999
because of the circularity of the lens, the lens
slightly out of focus, turns them into circles,
00:27:15.000 --> 00:27:19.999
circles…circles of confusion.
00:27:20.000 --> 00:27:28.000
[music]
00:27:45.000 --> 00:27:49.999
[sil.]
00:27:50.000 --> 00:27:54.999
When I started as a photographer, I mean,
00:27:55.000 --> 00:27:59.999
I had no photographic examples in mind. I knew… I
knew nothing about photography or any photographers.
00:28:00.000 --> 00:28:04.999
You know, it was… I was
a blank slate, right?
00:28:05.000 --> 00:28:09.999
But I did have an art history background.
So Vermeer certainly
00:28:10.000 --> 00:28:14.999
has always been in my mind since
I was an art student in the 60s.
00:28:15.000 --> 00:28:19.999
Well, so this is
00:28:20.000 --> 00:28:24.999
an 8 x 10 camera, it’s like
a little theatre, you know.
00:28:25.000 --> 00:28:29.999
And it is like a camera
obscura because all it
00:28:30.000 --> 00:28:34.999
is a back plain where the
film goes and a black box
00:28:35.000 --> 00:28:39.999
with the lens on the front, the light comes in and
flips the image upside down. It’s a simple mechanism
00:28:40.000 --> 00:28:44.999
as you can make and it’s basically
the birth of photography.
00:28:45.000 --> 00:28:53.000
[sil.]
00:29:00.000 --> 00:29:04.999
This requires you to go still.
00:29:05.000 --> 00:29:09.999
And to look at something very hard
00:29:10.000 --> 00:29:14.999
and make sure that you mean what you say
with this camera. It’s full of intension.
00:29:15.000 --> 00:29:19.999
And I think that when I
was working on the street
00:29:20.000 --> 00:29:24.999
with this small camera… And here,
I’ll just bring this over here.
00:29:25.000 --> 00:29:29.999
When I was working on the
street with the small camera,
00:29:30.000 --> 00:29:34.999
I was like a jazz musician.
00:29:35.000 --> 00:29:39.999
And when I work with this,
it’s as if I’m Pablo Casals,
00:29:40.000 --> 00:29:44.999
playing the cello. There’s a meditation
on things and Vermeer is about mediation.
00:29:45.000 --> 00:29:49.999
When you look at those paintings,
00:29:50.000 --> 00:29:54.999
when I look at those
paintings, I see the time
00:29:55.000 --> 00:29:59.999
it took to paint them. There’s
nothing hasty about those paintings.
00:30:00.000 --> 00:30:04.999
They seem like they’ve been lovingly made,
00:30:05.000 --> 00:30:09.999
stroke after stroke, they’ve been
brought into the kind of roundness
00:30:10.000 --> 00:30:14.999
that they describe. A life is
being lived in those paintings,
00:30:15.000 --> 00:30:19.999
a small moment, and that
small moment is the place
00:30:20.000 --> 00:30:24.999
where photography and Vermeer connect
because they look like a snap shot
00:30:25.000 --> 00:30:29.999
of a singular moment that is ordinary,
00:30:30.000 --> 00:30:34.999
someone stitching something,
someone reading a letter,
00:30:35.000 --> 00:30:39.999
they are observed moments
that have been stilled.
00:30:40.000 --> 00:30:44.999
So it’s that that’s the appeal of Vermeer.
00:30:45.000 --> 00:30:49.999
[music]
00:30:50.000 --> 00:30:54.999
People always say about Vermeer’s
painting, they’re so still.
00:30:55.000 --> 00:30:59.999
Which at one level’s crazy, of course,
they are still, they are paintings,
00:31:00.000 --> 00:31:04.999
they’re not moving. But it is true they are still
in a way that other paintings are not still.
00:31:05.000 --> 00:31:09.999
And oddly enough this is the flip of
what I was saying. Other paintings are
00:31:10.000 --> 00:31:14.999
still in the way that snap shots are
still, everybody in them is frozen,
00:31:15.000 --> 00:31:19.999
stillness, and frozen are opposite
actually. Stillness implies duration.
00:31:20.000 --> 00:31:24.999
And what Vermeer time and again
does weather here or here,
00:31:25.000 --> 00:31:29.999
or here, or what do we have.
00:31:30.000 --> 00:31:34.999
I think we had up there. I guess I lost her
there, the woman holding the pearl earrings.
00:31:35.000 --> 00:31:39.999
Time and again he chooses to do
00:31:40.000 --> 00:31:44.999
uh… through paintings of woman who are
standing still and having to stand still
00:31:45.000 --> 00:31:49.999
because they are pouring milk, because
00:31:50.000 --> 00:31:54.999
they are adjusting their pearl necklace,
because they’re testing the…the balance.
00:31:55.000 --> 00:31:59.999
Uh… So the time… or because
00:32:00.000 --> 00:32:04.999
they are sleeping in that, in that way
over there. And that… And what you have,
00:32:05.000 --> 00:32:09.999
instead of a snapshot, as you
have the strange feeling of them
00:32:10.000 --> 00:32:15.000
of time passing as you look at them. He anticipates
cinema, which is to say he anticipates duration.
00:32:25.000 --> 00:32:33.000
[music]
00:32:40.000 --> 00:32:44.999
[music]
00:32:45.000 --> 00:32:49.999
I was 19
00:32:50.000 --> 00:32:54.999
and visiting my sister in
Boston on a break from college
00:32:55.000 --> 00:32:59.999
and I went to her apartment and on the wall was
this painting of \"Girl With A Pearl Earrings\"
00:33:00.000 --> 00:33:04.999
a poster of it. And I took one
look, I’d never seen it before
00:33:05.000 --> 00:33:09.999
and I was completely smitten and
it’s been with me ever since.
00:33:10.000 --> 00:33:14.999
Wherever I’ve gone… Even if I’ve gone just
to live abroad for a few months somewhere,
00:33:15.000 --> 00:33:20.000
I’ve taken it with me and it hung in my bedroom
and then later in my study, it’s where it is now.
00:33:25.000 --> 00:33:29.999
I studied art in college
00:33:30.000 --> 00:33:34.999
and there is that strong connection
with, you know, Vermeer and my sort of
00:33:35.000 --> 00:33:39.999
history of art. His quality
of light is something
00:33:40.000 --> 00:33:44.999
which I’ve really studied and had in the
back of my mind. This is the 30x40…
00:33:45.000 --> 00:33:49.999
Yeah, matted yeah. And is this going somewhere or
it’s just on standby? Nope, it was one they got rich
00:33:50.000 --> 00:33:54.999
in him so just… The morning I
photograph the Afghan girl
00:33:55.000 --> 00:33:59.999
in a refugee camp in Pakistan was like
a very ordinary morning. In fact,
00:34:00.000 --> 00:34:04.999
it was around 11 o’clock and the
light was impossible, very bright,
00:34:05.000 --> 00:34:09.999
reflecting off the sand. So I was
actually looking for a place
00:34:10.000 --> 00:34:14.999
to work inside because I knew
the light would be softer
00:34:15.000 --> 00:34:19.999
and I could actually photograph
which, you know, much better effect.
00:34:20.000 --> 00:34:24.999
So as I was walking through this refugee
camp, I heard voices coming from this, uh,
00:34:25.000 --> 00:34:29.999
this tent and it was these young
girls chanting in their classroom.
00:34:30.000 --> 00:34:34.999
So I went up and I went into their
tent and asked the teacher, if I could
00:34:35.000 --> 00:34:39.999
look around and maybe take a few pictures.
I woke up one morning
00:34:40.000 --> 00:34:44.999
and I was lying in bed looking at her and I was sort of fretting
about the book I was working on because it wasn’t going well.
00:34:45.000 --> 00:34:49.999
And I was just looking at
her and I suddenly thought,
00:34:50.000 --> 00:34:54.999
I wonder what Vermeer did to her to
make her look like that? And it was
00:34:55.000 --> 00:34:59.999
umm… suddenly a revelation. Although
I knew a lot about Vermeer,
00:35:00.000 --> 00:35:04.999
I had never really thought about him, except
as the painter. I didn’t think about him
00:35:05.000 --> 00:35:09.999
as a man and it suddenly occurred to me that
this painting was not a portrait of a girl
00:35:10.000 --> 00:35:14.999
but actually a portrait of a relationship, that
what she was looking at, the way she was looking
00:35:15.000 --> 00:35:19.999
was reflecting how she felt about him.
My eye was struck by this
00:35:20.000 --> 00:35:24.999
one particular little girl who had
this really amazing kind of face
00:35:25.000 --> 00:35:29.999
and is really kind of haunted eyes
and I probably had her attention
00:35:30.000 --> 00:35:34.999
for maybe a minute or
two, maybe maximum three,
00:35:35.000 --> 00:35:39.999
and she was kind of looking into my
lens with this kind of curiosity
00:35:40.000 --> 00:35:44.999
or because this was the first time in her
life she had ever been photographed,
00:35:45.000 --> 00:35:49.999
and first time she’d ever met a foreigner.
So in a way she was as fascinated
00:35:50.000 --> 00:35:54.999
with me as I was with her.
What do you want sir,
00:35:55.000 --> 00:35:59.999
I asked, sitting. I was puzzled,
we never sat together. I shivered,
00:36:00.000 --> 00:36:04.999
although it was not cold. Don’t talk. He
opened the shutter, so that the light fell
00:36:05.000 --> 00:36:09.999
directly on my face. Look out of the
window. He sat down in his chair
00:36:10.000 --> 00:36:14.999
by the easel. I gazed at the new
church tower and swallowed.
00:36:15.000 --> 00:36:19.999
I could feel my jaw tightening and
my eyes widening, now look at me.
00:36:20.000 --> 00:36:28.000
[music]
00:36:30.000 --> 00:36:34.999
So she looked into my lens
and beautiful kind of blue,
00:36:35.000 --> 00:36:39.999
green, grey eyes. So you had
this beauty and the sensuality
00:36:40.000 --> 00:36:44.999
but you also had this kind
of raw reality where she’s
00:36:45.000 --> 00:36:49.999
clearly not a model and
she’s clearly not there,
00:36:50.000 --> 00:36:54.999
she’s kind of caught off guard a bit.
And there’s that off guard quality
00:36:55.000 --> 00:36:59.999
to the Girl With A Pearl Earring, her
mouth and her gesture with her head.
00:37:00.000 --> 00:37:04.999
It really makes you feel that
it’s very spontaneous, very real,
00:37:05.000 --> 00:37:09.999
the mundane becomes very
special, and unusual
00:37:10.000 --> 00:37:14.999
and…and magical, taking this kind
of ordinary moment and turning it
00:37:15.000 --> 00:37:19.999
into something really an extraordinary.
He seemed to be waiting for something.
00:37:20.000 --> 00:37:24.999
My face began to strain with the fear
that I was not giving him what he wanted.
00:37:25.000 --> 00:37:29.999
Great, he said softly. It
was all he had to say.
00:37:30.000 --> 00:37:34.999
My eyes filled with tears, I did not shed.
I knew now. Yes, don’t move,
00:37:35.000 --> 00:37:39.999
he was going to paint me.
00:37:40.000 --> 00:37:48.000
[music]
00:38:00.000 --> 00:38:04.999
When the exhibition opened,
Uh… I was driving along here
00:38:05.000 --> 00:38:09.999
and I think where on earth were all these people? Why
are they lining up? And then I finally realized it,
00:38:10.000 --> 00:38:14.999
they were lining up to get into the show.
But over time,
00:38:15.000 --> 00:38:19.999
they realized they need to get here early
and early and so people started lining up
00:38:20.000 --> 00:38:24.999
at 7 o’clock, 6 o’clock, 4
o’clock, 3 o’clock, 2 o’clock,
00:38:25.000 --> 00:38:29.999
midnight, in the middle of winter. So
we were in the snow on either side,
00:38:30.000 --> 00:38:34.999
freezing cold ice conditions. But by the
00:38:35.000 --> 00:38:39.999
end of the show they were
already in line by 9:00pm,
00:38:40.000 --> 00:38:44.999
for entrance the next morning at 10:00am.
00:38:45.000 --> 00:38:53.000
[music]
00:39:05.000 --> 00:39:09.999
I had her on my desk for month. So you
get to know a painting in an amazing way
00:39:10.000 --> 00:39:14.999
in that kind of opportunity. And one of
things that’s so wonderful in this work
00:39:15.000 --> 00:39:19.999
is color. Vermeer is a colorist. We’ll not
think about Vermeer as a colorist so much.
00:39:20.000 --> 00:39:24.999
But if you look at this painting and the red,
that wonderful red hat and the green glaze
00:39:25.000 --> 00:39:29.999
on her forehead, and then the little turquoise
highlight in her eye, and the little pink highlight
00:39:30.000 --> 00:39:34.999
in her mouth, and then the
yellow accents on the blue robe.
00:39:35.000 --> 00:39:40.000
It just, you know, luminous work.
00:39:45.000 --> 00:39:49.999
I never seen Vermeer, I wasn’t aware.
00:39:50.000 --> 00:39:54.999
I knew something about Rembrandt, but I
hadn’t seen Vermeer. And as soon I saw it,
00:39:55.000 --> 00:39:59.999
it was real like an admiration. It was more
like when one falls in love at least sometimes,
00:40:00.000 --> 00:40:04.999
you…you recognize something that I’d lost.
00:40:05.000 --> 00:40:09.999
Vermeer’s paintings are often built up
00:40:10.000 --> 00:40:14.999
very likely. Most of his paintings
took months in order to do.
00:40:15.000 --> 00:40:19.999
There’s a process, there’s building
up forums, building up light.
00:40:20.000 --> 00:40:24.999
Uh… It’s a slow process. But there are
those crucial moments in the painting
00:40:25.000 --> 00:40:29.999
that are not built up,
they’re not a process
00:40:30.000 --> 00:40:34.999
of…of slow working, but they’re,
00:40:35.000 --> 00:40:39.999
last just a few seconds, the
highlights, the girl with
00:40:40.000 --> 00:40:44.999
the red hat, she has turquoise highlights
00:40:45.000 --> 00:40:49.999
on her eyes. The eyes are
not illuminated directly,
00:40:50.000 --> 00:40:54.999
so you cannot really understand
where the light is coming from
00:40:55.000 --> 00:40:59.999
uh… because it doesn’t come directly from where all
the other lights, it’s because they are on the
00:41:00.000 --> 00:41:04.999
other side of the eye. He must have
taken a second a piece just to apply,
00:41:05.000 --> 00:41:09.999
but they make everything, all
the labor that he put in before
00:41:10.000 --> 00:41:14.999
come into focus. They painted turquoise
and it’s just one of those things that
00:41:15.000 --> 00:41:19.999
you don’t conceive. I don’t know
if you could observe turquoise.
00:41:20.000 --> 00:41:24.999
I’ve never seen turquoise highlights
in his dark unilluminated eyes
00:41:25.000 --> 00:41:29.999
but he did the exact sensation
that the… the moistness
00:41:30.000 --> 00:41:34.999
and the tenderness of the eyes. I
always wondered where those two
00:41:35.000 --> 00:41:39.999
turquoise stars have come from.
00:41:40.000 --> 00:41:48.000
[music]
00:42:00.000 --> 00:42:05.000
[music]
00:42:10.000 --> 00:42:14.999
As I said, it’s all been put in here by
my assistants without any sense of order,
00:42:15.000 --> 00:42:19.999
design.
00:42:20.000 --> 00:42:24.999
Oh, one second, here, maybe
I have it in here. Yes!
00:42:25.000 --> 00:42:29.999
Hey, we’re lucky. Look at that, on the top.
And that was a box without a label
00:42:30.000 --> 00:42:34.999
and it was just one of those lucky guesses.
00:42:35.000 --> 00:42:39.999
I have to be careful. This is
00:42:40.000 --> 00:42:44.999
a vintage print.
00:42:45.000 --> 00:42:49.999
So many years ago I had a
studio in Mid Town Manhattan,
00:42:50.000 --> 00:42:54.999
on 19th Street and it faced south.
And I had this incredible view
00:42:55.000 --> 00:42:59.999
of New York City with no big
buildings in front of me.
00:43:00.000 --> 00:43:04.999
Over the years, whenever there was something
interesting, in terms of weather or,
00:43:05.000 --> 00:43:09.999
you know, seasons, or light, I would
make a large format photograph,
00:43:10.000 --> 00:43:14.999
looking south. And, of course,
these two buildings were in,
00:43:15.000 --> 00:43:19.999
they were in the way. But I kept on seeing
00:43:20.000 --> 00:43:24.999
the seasonal changes and
the quality of light
00:43:25.000 --> 00:43:29.999
and how they had sometimes no substance, and
sometimes they were solid, and sometimes
00:43:30.000 --> 00:43:34.999
it was night and they were glowing.
And I kept on thinking of this
00:43:35.000 --> 00:43:39.999
as a landscape, as a mountain
range in the distance.
00:43:40.000 --> 00:43:44.999
And in 2001, I was due to have a show,
00:43:45.000 --> 00:43:49.999
in a gallery in SoHo, called \"Looking
South New York City Landscapes.\"
00:43:50.000 --> 00:43:54.999
It was October of 2001 was the schedule.
00:43:55.000 --> 00:43:59.999
And a few days before September 11th,
00:44:00.000 --> 00:44:04.999
I was Downtown in New York
printing this show and I made
00:44:05.000 --> 00:44:09.999
the last photograph of this place.
This picture was made
00:44:10.000 --> 00:44:14.999
just a
00:44:15.000 --> 00:44:19.999
four days before the Towers were struck. And
I remember, when I made this photograph,
00:44:20.000 --> 00:44:24.999
it was just dusk coming on and I thought,
well, it’s not very interesting,
00:44:25.000 --> 00:44:29.999
no drama or anything. And I thought
I’ll come back in a few weeks
00:44:30.000 --> 00:44:34.999
when I’m back in New York because they’ll always be there.
You know, the way you think something like mountains
00:44:35.000 --> 00:44:39.999
are constant and then, of
course, four days later, gone.
00:44:40.000 --> 00:44:48.000
[music]
00:45:00.000 --> 00:45:04.999
During his lifetime, there were three wars between
England and Holland, one of which resulted
00:45:05.000 --> 00:45:09.999
in Holland losing New Amsterdam.
Louis XIV invades
00:45:10.000 --> 00:45:14.999
Holland and…and the Netherlands breach
their own dykes, resulting in an
00:45:15.000 --> 00:45:19.999
economic calamity which is the mediate,
proximate cause of Vermeer’s own death
00:45:20.000 --> 00:45:24.999
at the age of 43. So his world was
filled with this kind of violence.
00:45:25.000 --> 00:45:33.000
[sil.]
00:45:35.000 --> 00:45:39.999
This of course is the
classic view of Manhattan,
00:45:40.000 --> 00:45:44.999
although it’s also a view of Manhattan with
its teeth knocked out, it’s two front teeth,
00:45:45.000 --> 00:45:49.999
the Twin Towers. Whenever you’re approaching it from
this side, that’s the first thing you think of.
00:45:50.000 --> 00:45:54.999
In much the way that the view have delved,
00:45:55.000 --> 00:45:59.999
the Vermeer, the great Vermeer painting, which to
us is a view of a peaceful town of civic virtue
00:46:00.000 --> 00:46:04.999
and so forth. In fact, at its time,
00:46:05.000 --> 00:46:09.999
was a picture of a town
with its teeth knocked out.
00:46:10.000 --> 00:46:14.999
Armory was right back there. The armory
which is five years earlier had exploded,
00:46:15.000 --> 00:46:19.999
the gun powder had exploded
killing hundreds of people,
00:46:20.000 --> 00:46:24.999
many more in relation to the size of (inaudible)
and were killed in the World Trade Centre
00:46:25.000 --> 00:46:29.999
collapse in relation to the size of
Manhattan. And when you look at, when anybody
00:46:30.000 --> 00:46:34.999
at that time would’ve looked at that painting, that’s what they
would have seen, just as any New Yorker looking at this sight,
00:46:35.000 --> 00:46:39.999
all they can think of is what’s not there.
It’s the thinking of what’s not there.
00:46:40.000 --> 00:46:44.999
With the lamps, as the skyscrapers, something
missing, something terribly missing.
00:46:45.000 --> 00:46:53.000
[music]
00:47:25.000 --> 00:47:29.999
When you see a map on a back wall,
00:47:30.000 --> 00:47:34.999
behind a woman in one of Vermeer’s
paintings, a map is not a neutral option.
00:47:35.000 --> 00:47:39.999
A map is a sight of hundreds of
martyrologies. I mean, this is a place
00:47:40.000 --> 00:47:44.999
where there had been terrible battles between Protestants
and Catholics and the generations immediately prior.
00:47:45.000 --> 00:47:49.999
When you see a woman reading a letter, from who
knows where. When you see a soldier (inaudible)
00:47:50.000 --> 00:47:54.999
with a large hat with a woman.
I mean, all this stuff
00:47:55.000 --> 00:47:59.999
is conspicuously being alluded to. When you see
the lions heads on the chairs, it has this
00:48:00.000 --> 00:48:04.999
continual reference to
a political chaos that
00:48:05.000 --> 00:48:09.999
is conspicuously being pushed
back, held at bay. And in fact,
00:48:10.000 --> 00:48:14.999
what is instead being replaced with is a
peacefulness but a peace that is been invented,
00:48:15.000 --> 00:48:19.999
is been asserted. And one of the things that
draws us so much to Vermeer is…is precisely
00:48:20.000 --> 00:48:24.999
the way that indeed they
are so filled with peace.
00:48:25.000 --> 00:48:29.999
It is peacefulness in this world, as
peacefulness wrenched out of all that, violence
00:48:30.000 --> 00:48:34.999
and violence is what those paintings are about, because
it was conspicuously excluded from those paintings.
00:48:35.000 --> 00:48:43.000
[music]
00:48:50.000 --> 00:48:55.000
[sil.]
00:49:00.000 --> 00:49:04.999
So I think one of the things that Vermeer does
is to challenge our feeling about what’s news,
00:49:05.000 --> 00:49:09.999
umm… and what’s important. So
here we are today, Thursday,
00:49:10.000 --> 00:49:14.999
May the 7th, 2000, and according to the New York
Times, you know, a bomber’s dairy is important,
00:49:15.000 --> 00:49:19.999
budget cuts, et cetera, et cetera.
00:49:20.000 --> 00:49:24.999
So Hollywood’s leading ladies, the problem with Hollywood
leading ladies is that there are not many of them.
00:49:25.000 --> 00:49:29.999
And there are very many of us. So what
happens is, you don’t have one of your own,
00:49:30.000 --> 00:49:34.999
you’re going to end up feeling very sad.
You’re going to think why… why is my life
00:49:35.000 --> 00:49:39.999
not more like this? There’s a lot of envy,
a feeling that the real world is going on
00:49:40.000 --> 00:49:44.999
somewhere else. Look at this, lovely one.
Hilary Swank. So look at her there.
00:49:45.000 --> 00:49:49.999
Would Vermeer have painted her? Probably not.
She looks too confident to openly sexual,
00:49:50.000 --> 00:49:54.999
to openly attractive. She
makes most of us feel,
00:49:55.000 --> 00:49:59.999
\"What’s going wrong in my life?\" How come Hilary
Swank is not in my life? So I think that good thing
00:50:00.000 --> 00:50:04.999
about Vermeer is that he not that. He’s
a opposite of that kind of glamour.
00:50:05.000 --> 00:50:09.999
Umm… It’s not to say his pictures
aren’t beautiful, but I think they are
00:50:10.000 --> 00:50:14.999
idealizations of actually the real world,
our world, not some other fantasy world.
00:50:15.000 --> 00:50:19.999
And so we…we feel grateful
to Vermeer almost for
00:50:20.000 --> 00:50:24.999
saving us from the feelings of
envy and dissatisfaction promoted
00:50:25.000 --> 00:50:29.999
by Vanity Fair.
00:50:30.000 --> 00:50:38.000
[music]
00:50:45.000 --> 00:50:49.999
I think no one is attracted to Vermeer
00:50:50.000 --> 00:50:54.999
who isn’t at some level threatened by
the opposite of the values in Vermeer.
00:50:55.000 --> 00:50:59.999
Uh… I think whenever fall in love
with a work of art, at some level
00:51:00.000 --> 00:51:04.999
because it has something we don’t have enough
of. And I don’t have enough of the Vermeer
00:51:05.000 --> 00:51:09.999
in my life as it were. I didn’t
have enough of the sense of calm,
00:51:10.000 --> 00:51:14.999
of acceptance of daily life. Umm… Of…
00:51:15.000 --> 00:51:19.999
In a sense the, it’s a kind of
wisdom almost you could say.
00:51:20.000 --> 00:51:24.999
Umm… It’s Vermeer’s propaganda for a
certain way of life, umm… which I think,
00:51:25.000 --> 00:51:30.000
me and the modern world, more generally,
are often in danger of losing sight of.
Distributor: Icarus Films
Length: 52 minutes
Date: 2009
Genre: Expository
Language: English; Dutch
Grade: 9-12, college, adult
Color/BW:
Closed Captioning: Available
Existing customers, please log in to view this film.
New to Docuseek? Register to request a quote.
Related Films
With his imposing canvasses, pure color and texture, Mark Rothko sought…
The contemporary art world is changing dramatically. How are collectors,…